What's the Difference Between Implication and Conjunction in Logic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ych22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditional
ych22
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
"Every student in this class has studied calculus".

Q(x): x is in this class.
P(x): x has studied calculus.

How come we have Q(x)->P(x) but not Q(x) ^ P(x)? What really is the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ych22 said:
"Every student in this class has studied calculus".

Q(x): x is in this class.
P(x): x has studied calculus.

How come we have Q(x)->P(x) but not Q(x) ^ P(x)? What really is the difference?

The difference is that one is an implication and the other is a conjunction. The conjunction simply says P and Q which are one of your premises and your conclusion. The implication says Q implies P. If the implication is true, as it is given the premises, does P therefore imply Q?
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top