What's the difference between internetworking and VPN in a microscopic view.

  • Thread starter Thread starter lostinxlation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the differences between VPN (Virtual Private Network) and conventional internetworking from a microscopic perspective, focusing on how VPNs provide privacy and security while transmitting data over public networks. Participants examine the technical aspects of packet transmission, encryption, and routing in both contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that VPNs create a secure IP tunnel between sites, while conventional internetworking connects a LAN to a larger network.
  • Others argue that VPNs are private connections between multiple LANs, typically involving encryption, which raises questions about how this encryption affects routing and security.
  • A participant questions how routers can forward encrypted packets if the entire packet is encrypted, suggesting that only the payload is encrypted while routing information remains visible.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the routers at each end of a VPN connection handle the routing without the local machines needing to know about the internet, similar to local network routers.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of VPN packet formats, noting that the inner packet retains its conventional IP structure while being encapsulated in an outer packet that specifies the target router's address.
  • There is a suggestion that VPNs provide security by preventing others on the internet from reading packet contents and by simplifying network identification for devices within the same LAN.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the specifics of how VPNs function compared to conventional internetworking, particularly concerning encryption and routing. The discussion remains unresolved with no clear consensus on the advantages of VPNs over traditional methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding how encryption impacts routing and the visibility of packet headers, indicating that assumptions about packet handling and security may vary.

lostinxlation
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
As the title says...
Basically, VPN has the IP tunnel between the sites which shares the same interest,but I wonder how it is different from conventional internetworking. It just delivers the packet from one end of IP tunnel to the other end of it by using the same method as IP protocol, so that I'm not quite sure what is the peculiarity of VPN comparing to the internetworking from a microscopic view and what makes it more secured than the regular internet since IP packet is anyway going through the public network.
Could anyone explain the difference ?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
internetworking is connecting a LAN to the larger network.
VPN is connecting two (or more) LANS privately through an internetwork connection.

Generally the VPN would also be encrypted.
 
mgb_phys said:
internetworking is connecting a LAN to the larger network.
VPN is connecting two (or more) LANS privately through an internetwork connection.

Generally the VPN would also be encrypted.
Thanks, but my question is how does it make it privately. As you know, the IP datagram with VPN goes through the public networks along the way like the conventional IP and what makes it more secured, while the VPN uses the same IP protocol.
And as for encryption, how does all the routers in between can figure out where to forward if the entire packet was encrypted ? Or if only payload gets encrypted, the internetworking should be able to do the same thing as well, so I'm puzzled how it is the advantage over the internetworking.
 
Last edited:
The bit that makes it a VPN is mostly the routers at each end so that local machine 1 calling local machine 2 doesn't need to know that the data goes over the internet.
This is really no different from a routers job on your local nework, your laptop on wifi connecting to your desktop doesn't need to know which cable it's on - the router handles that.

Only the packet contents are encrypted, the routing information is added by each step in the router chain, this isn't encrypted (there are ways of encrypting the routing but that's another story)

The advantage of just putting all your machines on the internet, is both security (the packets are encrypted) and using less internet address - you only need one gobal address for each LAN, not one for every single machine.
 
mgb_phys said:
The bit that makes it a VPN is mostly the routers at each end so that local machine 1 calling local machine 2 doesn't need to know that the data goes over the internet.
Does that mean the router to router on VPN is a direct connection without any other networks in between ? My understanding is the packet via VPN goes through a multiple netwoks(routers) placed along the way between the sending LAN and receiving LAN.

Only the packet contents are encrypted, the routing information is added by each step in the router chain, this isn't encrypted (there are ways of encrypting the routing but that's another story)
.
Shouldn't regular internetworking be able to do the same thing since payload has nothing to do with routing, and if so, what is the advantage of VPN encryption over the conventional IP ?
 
Last edited:
lostinxlation said:
Does that mean the router to router on VPN is a direct connection without any other networks in between ? My understanding is the packet via VPN goes through a multiple netwoks(routers) placed along the way between the sending LAN and receiving LAN.
Yes once the packet goes onto the internet it gets routed like any other packet.
The important part is that once it gets to the LAN at the other end, that router makes it look like it came from the same lan, and any traffic back to any of the machines on the same lan that are actually at the other site gets passed back through the router


Shouldn't regular internetworking be able to do the same thing since payload has nothing to do with routing
Yes, the VPN simply adds a bit more header to allow the destination to know details about the sender network, normally when you connect to PF the PF web server doesn't know (or need to know) anythign about your internal LAN - it only knows the route back to your router.

what is the advantage of VPN encryption over the conventional IP ?
So everybody else on the internet can't read the contents of those packets.
The VPN also allows connections to be identified once at the router so every program that uses the network, eg network printers, don't all need to be secured against everyone on the internet
 
Thank you.

I just looked up the packet format of VPN and found that the packet is actually double wrapped. Inner packet is the conventional IP packet with IP address of the destination host in its header, and outer packet has the header that specifies the address of the target router. I found your second point makes sense because, with the VPN packet format, the inner packet can be encrypted and no one outside can see the detailed header info to the target host, let alone payload, except IP address of the target router.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K