What's the electric potential of the Earth?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric potential of the Earth, particularly when considering different reference points for potential, such as the surface of the Earth versus infinity. Participants explore the implications of Earth's charge and potential on human bodies, questioning the assumptions behind calculations related to capacitance and excess charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption that the reference for zero potential is the Earth's surface and proposes considering infinity instead, leading to a calculated electric potential of -800 MV for the Earth.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of such a potential on human bodies, particularly regarding excess negative charge and the resulting calculations that suggest an implausible amount of charge when multiplied by the global population.
  • Another participant identifies a contradiction in reasoning, suggesting that human bodies should be considered either as part of the Earth conductor or as separate conductors in electrostatic equilibrium with the Earth.
  • Some participants discuss the effect of the ionosphere on the electric potential and argue that the system should be analyzed between the ionosphere and the Earth, rather than assuming a direct relationship to infinity.
  • Calculations are presented that challenge the initial assumptions about capacitance and potential, suggesting that the equilibrium potential would be much lower than -800 MV when considering the combined capacitance of the Earth and human bodies.
  • Several participants emphasize that the potential difference across a capacitor is what matters, not the potential relative to infinity, and that the human body is not isolated in this context.
  • Disagreements arise regarding the correct values for Earth's capacitance and the implications for the charge distribution among humans and the Earth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the calculations and assumptions about electric potential, capacitance, and charge distribution. There is no consensus on the correct approach or values, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the uniformity of charge distribution, the treatment of human bodies as conductors, and the neglect of the ionosphere's role in the electric potential system. Various mathematical steps and models are proposed, but none are universally accepted.

jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
I was wondering, we constantly assume the reference of zero potential is the surface of the Earth. But if we consider the reference to be the infinity, what would be the electric potential of the Earth?

As Faraday says, the Earth is charged with a -580 kC of negative charge. If we consider the radius of the Earth to be 6400 km, and consider the charge to be radially uniform, the electric potential of Earth would be -800 MV.

I know that it is electric current that kill us, but a potential of -800 MV in Earth (and in us) would imply a lot of excess of electrons in our body. Also, the calculations I did for the excess charge in our body does not seem to make sense. All pages in the interent says that human body has a capacitance of about 100 pF. That would imply an excess charge of -0,08C if we consider we are in voltage equilibrium with the Earth (considering we are here for hundreds of millions of years, I would assume this is true)

But if we multiply 7 billion people with 0,08C we find 1000 times more than the -580C. It seems that I made some assumption wrong. Can anyone help me to identify what I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you have two contradicting lines of reasoning.

One line of reasoning considers our bodies as part of the Earth spherical conductor and the other line of reasoning considers our bodies as separate conductors that are in electrostatic equilibrium with the Earth conductor. That's what goes wrong with your post in my opinion.
 
Delta2 said:
Well you have two contradicting lines of reasoning.

One line of reasoning considers our bodies as part of the Earth spherical conductor and the other line of reasoning considers our bodies as separate conductors that are in electrostatic equilibrium with the Earth conductor. That's what goes wrong with your post in my opinion.
Hello Delta! Thanks for the answer!

Do you think the parallel assossiation of our bodies to the Earth would change Earth ‘s capacitance significatively?
 
jaumzaum said:
Hello Delta! Thanks for the answer!

Do you think the parallel assossiation of our bodies to the Earth would change Earth ‘s capacitance significatively?
Hmm, it depends what is your exact model (for example you model Earth as a spherical conductor, WITHOUT the 7 billion human bodies and having total charge -540kCb?) and then you want to find how this charge is split to 7 billion conductors of capacitance 100pF .., I think after some thought that the electrostatic equilibrium will not be at a potential of -800MV but at a much lower potential...
 
So yes in a way yes the total capacitance of the system of earth+7 billion conductors of 100pF is significantly different than the capacitance of Earth alone.
 
People do not have one foot on the Earth and the other at "infinity" as your 0.08C calculation assumes.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds, vanhees71 and DaveE
The ionosphere is conductive and is between infinity and the Earth's surface. You must analyse the system between the ionosphere and the Earth, or the ionosphere and infinity.
Currents flow between Earth and the ionosphere, and between the ionosphere and space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Vanadium 50 said:
People do not have one foot on the Earth and the other at "infinity" as your 0.08C calculation assumes.
Thanks for the answer Vanadium!
In my head I was not assuming this. Can you explain to me why do you think I made that assumption?

My reasoning: If we have 2 spheres, a big one (Earth) with capacitance C1 and a small of (human) with capacitance C2. When we put both in contact, as C2 is much bigger than C1, the voltage of C1 in the end would be the voltage of C2 initially, that is -800MV compared to infinity. If a sphere has -800MV of voltage compared to infinity and a capacitance C1=100pF, its charge would be
Q=C1V=0,08C

Also, do you think the -800MV is right?
 
It's the potential difference across a capacitor that matters. 800 MV is the difference between the Earth and "infinity", not between one foot and the other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #10
jaumzaum said:
As Faraday says, the Earth is charged with a -580 kC of negative charge.
Please provide reference for this number. This may be the surface charge but as mentioned by @Baluncore most of the charge separation is relative to the ionosphere. Interesting physics but your numbers are not at all correct I think.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu
  • #11
jaumzaum said:
If a sphere has -800MV of voltage compared to infinity and a capacitance C1=100pF,
That is for an isolated sphere. As soon as you are near Earth it changes and if you attach it to the Earth it is just a bump on a log.
 
  • #12
Vanadium 50 said:
It's the potential difference across a capacitor that matters. 800 MV is the difference between the Earth and "infinity", not between one foot and the other.

I know that. If we had a potential difference of -800 MV between both of our feet, this would imply a large electric current between our feet. Considering we have 100 kOhm - 1 MOhm of resistance, and 100mA is enough to kill us, we would be imediately dead.

But as I said, it's not with the current that I am concerned, I am concerned with the excess charge. That is, the amount of electrons that we have more than protons. And, by what I understand, we calculate the electric charge of a solid capacitor using the potential relative to infinity.

Sure this is the potential difference between our bodies and infinity, and sure this will not make any electric current, but this would create a lot of excess negative charge in our bodies, and that is what I am concerned.

It seems a little absurd to say that we have 0,08C of excess negative electric charge, More so because if we multiply this with the amount of people, we get more than the charge of earth. And we didn't even account for all the others things on Earth, like animals, building, trees...
 
  • #13
Even if we ignore the problem mentioned at post #6, your value of 0.08C is still not correct. The Earth capacitance is $$C_{Earth}=\frac{Q}{\frac{KQ}{R_{Earth}}}=\frac{R_{Earth}}{K}=\frac{6.4\cdot 10^6}{8.9\cdot 10^9}=0.719mF$$. 7 billion conductors of 100pF have a total capacitance $$C_{human}=7\cdot 10^9\cdot 10^2\cdot 10^{-12}F=7\cdot10^{-1}F=700mF$$. So its like connecting a conductor of 0.719mF to a conductor of 700mF. Most of the charge will go to the conductor of 700mF, so that $$V_{equilibrium}=\frac{Q}{0.719}=\frac{Q'}{700},Q+Q'=580kC$$. The common potential ##V_{equilibrium}## of the equilibrium won't be 800MV but much much lower.

Your model has the problems, that Vanadium, Baluncore and hutchphd mentions, but even if we ignore these problems, your value of 0.08C per human is still not correct, and that's what I am trying to explain here.

If you solve the above system of equations you ll find that ##Q'=579,4kC## and that ##V_{equilibrium}=\frac{Q'}{700mF}=827.7kV## and also that each human body has a charge of ##q=\frac{Q'}{7\cdot10^9}=8.2\cdot 10^-5C##
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Again this is totally wrong.
  1. Our bodies are not isolated
  2. The capacitor is the surface of the Earth relative to the ionosphere. If you work it out the capacitance is about 1F so the potential difference is 500kV. In fact there is an electric field of about 100v/m at the surface because of this.
It would be a good Idea to read the answers already supplied and try to understand them.

.edit: I am referring here to #12 by @jaumzaum. I was too slow!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K