What's the superposition principle for group action?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the superposition principle for group actions, specifically in the context of vector fields and rotations. The group functions are defined as ##G(t)=exp(\theta^1(t)X_1)## and ##G'(t)=exp(\theta^2(t)X_2)##, representing rotations around the ##x^1## and ##x^2## axes, respectively. The key conclusion is that the combined effect of these group actions on a vector ##v(t_0)## can be expressed through a differential equation, leading to the formula: $$v(t)=v(t_0)T\{exp\int(\partial_t\theta^1(t)X_1+\partial_t\theta^2(t)X_2)dt\}$$, which ensures that the local change of the vector field includes both infinitesimal rotations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and group actions
  • Familiarity with Lie groups and Lie algebras
  • Knowledge of differential equations
  • Experience with vector fields and their transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lie product formula and its applications in group actions
  • Explore the Trotter product formula for operator splitting
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of vector fields in physics
  • Investigate the implications of infinitesimal transformations in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in advanced topics such as group theory, vector field transformations, and the application of differential equations in modeling dynamic systems.

Jianbing_Shao
Messages
140
Reaction score
2
A very simple question: if given a vector ##v(t_0)## and two group functions ##G(t)## and ##G'(t)##, here ##t## is the parameter of time, the two group functions act on ##v(t_0)## simultaneously, then we can get a vector field ##v(t)##, then how to get ##v(t)##?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It is unclear to me what you mean. Can you be more specific?
 
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me what you mean. Can you be more specific?

ok. for example,if ##G(t)=exp(\theta^1(t)X_1)## is a rotation around ##x^1## axis, and ##G'(t)=exp(\theta^2(t)X_2)## is a rotation around ##x^2## axis,
Now if we only act ##G(t)## on a vector ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^1## axis, we act ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^2## axis,
If we act ##G(t)## and ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)## at the same time, then what vector field shall we get?
 
Jianbing_Shao said:
ok. for example,if ##G(t)=exp(\theta^1(t)X_1)## is a rotation around ##x^1## axis, and ##G'(t)=exp(\theta^2(t)X_2)## is a rotation around ##x^2## axis,
Now if we only act ##G(t)## on a vector ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^1## axis, we act ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)##, we can get a vector rotate around ##x^2## axis,
If we act ##G(t)## and ##G'(t)## on ##v(t_0)## at the same time, then what vector field shall we get?
Again, it is unclear what you mean by ”acting on v at the same time”. I suspect that this is where your confusion lies. There are several things I could imagine this meaning. Which one you are after would depend on what exactly you are trying to do.
 
Orodruin said:
Again, it is unclear what you mean by ”acting on v at the same time”. I suspect that this is where your confusion lies. There are several things I could imagine this meaning. Which one you are after would depend on what exactly you are trying to do.

What I mean is that between time ##t## and ##t+\delta t##, the change of vector only contains two parts: ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^1(t))X_1)\delta t)## and ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^2(t))X_2)\delta t)##.
Do you think ”acting on v at the same time”can have other meaning?
 
Jianbing_Shao said:
What I mean is that between time ##t## and ##t+\delta t##, the change of vector only contains two parts: ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^1(t))X_1)\delta t)## and ##v(t)exp((\partial_t(\theta^2(t))X_2)\delta t)##.
Do you think ”acting on v at the same time”can have other meaning?
But how do combine the two parts into one?

In general if I have two operators A and B, combining them could mean AB or BA or A+B or something else.

Are you, perhaps, referring to the Lie product formula or the related Trotter product formula?
 
DrGreg said:
But how do combine the two parts into one?

In general if I have two operators A and B, combining them could mean AB or BA or A+B or something else.

Are you, perhaps, referring to the Lie product formula or the related Trotter product formula?

In my opinion. perhaps Lie product formula is also not valid here, I think we can use differential equations here,
to the example mentioned above, we can describe ##v(t)## in such a way:
$$\partial_t v(t)=v(t)(\partial_t\theta^1(t)X_1+\partial_t\theta^2(t)X_2)$$
Then we can get ##v(t)## in the formula of time-ordered product:
$$v(t)=v(t_0)T\{exp\int(\partial_t\theta^1(t)X_1+\partial_t\theta^2(t)X_2)dt\}$$
This formula can guarantee that the local change of vector field only contains two Infinitesimal rotations。
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
633
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
939
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
961
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K