B What's Wrong with this article on Stonehenge history?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article History
AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques an article claiming that Stonehenge builders utilized the Pythagorean theorem, which is historically inaccurate since Pythagoras lived centuries after the construction of Stonehenge. Participants note that the principles of right triangles, such as the 3:4:5 triangle, were known in ancient Egypt long before Pythagoras. There is a call for more evidence regarding the mathematical knowledge of ancient cultures, suggesting that much may have been lost or unrecognized. The conversation also touches on the broader issue of attributing mathematical knowledge primarily to the Greeks, despite evidence of earlier civilizations' contributions. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for a more nuanced understanding of ancient mathematics and its origins.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pythagoras lived between 570 BC and 495 BC. His theorem, a part of Euclidean geometry taught in many high school math classes, states that the hypotenuse of a right triangle (the side opposite the right angle) equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

I believe this should say the square of the hypotenuse. Beyond that I'm uncertain of what may be incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
And the Professor said anyone else?
 
5:12:13 was known in ancient Egypt long before Pythagoras, and 3:4:5 was known as well. What Pythagoras found was the general pattern. Examples of rectangular triangles are not the Pythagorean theorem.

12:35:37 is more interesting if it can be shown that this was deliberate.
 
mfb said:
5:12:13 was known in ancient Egypt long before Pythagoras, and 3:4:5 was known as well. What Pythagoras found was the general pattern. Examples of rectangular triangles are not the Pythagorean theorem.

12:35:37 is more interesting if it can be shown that this was deliberate.

We regard nearly everything we know to the Greeks (Everything started with the Greeks). In my humble opinion, this is because we have more evidence from the Greeks than any previous culture. Its not like there were no others before them.

Sometimes I get irritated by the fact that we do not know really how much people knew before the Greeks. Maybe they knew Pythagoras theorem but there was no lift evidence for that, who knows, right?!
 
Last edited:
Yes, this is true of Physics as well. There were many formulas known to the ancients that were in common use in engineering that were later derived from Newton's laws. One such formula was the diameter of a torsion catapult rope where the ancients correctly determined that it was proportional the the cube root of the mass to be thrown.

https://books.google.com/books?id=5UohAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA71&lpg=PA71&dq=roman+catapult+cube+root+torsion+formula&source=bl&ots=nxYQnfSzBm&sig=9vUuYQOpfZ76ADFujC7AFA5q6Z8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjTtKL6q-fbAhUPWa0KHW4JDL0Q6AEITDAI#v=onepage&q=roman catapult cube root torsion formula&f=false

http://www.s608324909.websitehome.co.uk/JohnMcCoy/Catapults%20and%20Cube%20Roots.pdf
 
Last edited:
ppict2.gif

The oldest proof - one word: "See!"
 

Attachments

  • ppict2.gif
    ppict2.gif
    4.9 KB · Views: 439
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
830
Back
Top