When Do Complex Matrices Yield Infinite Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
i remmember my teacher mentioned that when we have a matrix with a parameter
and i am asked to find for which values there are infinite number of answers
no answer or a single answer

she said that if the space is defined as C then we must carry on
and split into complex numbers

i can't find a question that makes that

can you give me an example to work on??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transgalactic said:
i remmember my teacher mentioned that when we have a matrix with a parameter
and i am asked to find for which values there are infinite number of answers
no answer or a single answer

she said that if the space is defined as C then we must carry on
and split into complex numbers

i can't find a question that makes that

can you give me an example to work on??

I doubt your teacher said that, exactly! I suspect that your teacher was talking about a matrix equation, like Ax= b where A depends on a parameter. If the determinant of A is non-zero, remember, A has an inverse so multiplying by that inverse on both sides of the equation gives A-1Ax= x= A-1b, a single solution.

If the determinant of A is 0, however, either of two things can happen. If the determinant of A is 0, then the kernel of A has dimension greater than 0 and so the dimension of the image A is less than the dimension of the space. If b happens to lie in the image of A, then there will be an infinite number of solutions. If b is not in the image of A, then there is no solution.

If the vector space is over the complex numbers (not "defined as C") then the entries in the vectors b and x, as well as A can be complex numbers. She may have said that you can split them into real and imaginary parts but surely not "split into complex numbers".