When exactly does the tabular method for integration by parts fail?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the limitations of the tabular method for integration by parts, particularly when dealing with integrands that include natural logarithms or products of exponential functions and trigonometric functions. It is established that the tabular method fails when neither factor can be differentiated to zero, such as in integrals of the form $$\int e^x\sin x\ dx$$. An alternative approach using complex exponentials is suggested, which simplifies the integration process by leveraging the relationship $$e^{ix}=\cos x + i \sin x$$. The discussion also introduces a formula for integrating products of functions that satisfy specific second derivative conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and exponential functions
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Ability to differentiate functions and apply second derivative tests
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the tabular method for integration by parts in detail
  • Learn about integrating products of exponential and trigonometric functions
  • Explore the use of complex numbers in integration, particularly Euler's formula
  • Investigate the general formula for integrating products of functions with constant second derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques, particularly those tackling complex integrals involving exponential and trigonometric functions.

-Dragoon-
Messages
308
Reaction score
7
I found this interesting but different way to solve integration by parts problems on the internet: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/integration20by20parts2.jpg/

It seems to work well for me when doing most textbook problems, except when the integrand contains a natural logarithm. I just want to know, are there other special circumstances in which you'd have to do use the definition of integration by parts to carry out the integration?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be able to differentiate one of the factor to 0, at which point the table ends. This fails when say, you have integrand of the form of product of exponential and cosine or sine, neither which can be differentiated to zero [there are however also clever way to deal with this kind of integrand, but I have to go now...].
 
yenchin said:
You need to be able to differentiate one of the factor to 0, at which point the table ends. This fails when say, you have integrand of the form of product of exponential and cosine or sine, neither which can be differentiated to zero [there are however also clever way to deal with this kind of integrand, but I have to go now...].

Interesting, and which method is this? I've tried searching for it and found nothing. Thanks in advance.
 
yenchin said:
You need to be able to differentiate one of the factor to 0, at which point the table ends. This fails when say, you have integrand of the form of product of exponential and cosine or sine, neither which can be differentiated to zero [there are however also clever way to deal with this kind of integrand, but I have to go now...].

-Dragoon- said:
Interesting, and which method is this? I've tried searching for it and found nothing. Thanks in advance.

He's probably referring to integrals of the form$$\int e^x\sin x\ dx$$ or similar with a cosine. Those require two integrations by parts and then solving for the unknown integral. But an easier way is to observe the ##e^{ix}=\cos x + i \sin x## so the above integral can be done by just taking the imaginary part of $$\int e^xe^{ix}\ dx = \int e^{(1+i)x}\ dx$$Just work that using the exponential rules and rationalize it. You get$$\int e^x\sin x\ dx$$by taking the imaginary part, and for free you also get$$\int e^x\cos x\ dx$$by taking the real part.
 
I actually have in mind the following:

You can show that the following is true:

Suppose that \dfrac{d^2f}{dx^2}=nf and \dfrac{d^2g}{dx^2}=mg, that is if the functions are constant multiple of themselves, and m \neq n, then the integral of the product fg is given by

\displaystyle\int fg dx = \frac{f\frac{dg}{dx}-\frac{df}{dx}g}{m-n} + C.

Note that there is no need to carry out any integration!
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
23K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K