When exactly does the tabular method for integration by parts fail?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 18K views
-Dragoon-
Messages
308
Reaction score
7
I found this interesting but different way to solve integration by parts problems on the internet: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/integration20by20parts2.jpg/

It seems to work well for me when doing most textbook problems, except when the integrand contains a natural logarithm. I just want to know, are there other special circumstances in which you'd have to do use the definition of integration by parts to carry out the integration?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be able to differentiate one of the factor to 0, at which point the table ends. This fails when say, you have integrand of the form of product of exponential and cosine or sine, neither which can be differentiated to zero [there are however also clever way to deal with this kind of integrand, but I have to go now...].
 
yenchin said:
You need to be able to differentiate one of the factor to 0, at which point the table ends. This fails when say, you have integrand of the form of product of exponential and cosine or sine, neither which can be differentiated to zero [there are however also clever way to deal with this kind of integrand, but I have to go now...].

Interesting, and which method is this? I've tried searching for it and found nothing. Thanks in advance.
 
yenchin said:
You need to be able to differentiate one of the factor to 0, at which point the table ends. This fails when say, you have integrand of the form of product of exponential and cosine or sine, neither which can be differentiated to zero [there are however also clever way to deal with this kind of integrand, but I have to go now...].

-Dragoon- said:
Interesting, and which method is this? I've tried searching for it and found nothing. Thanks in advance.

He's probably referring to integrals of the form$$\int e^x\sin x\ dx$$ or similar with a cosine. Those require two integrations by parts and then solving for the unknown integral. But an easier way is to observe the ##e^{ix}=\cos x + i \sin x## so the above integral can be done by just taking the imaginary part of $$\int e^xe^{ix}\ dx = \int e^{(1+i)x}\ dx$$Just work that using the exponential rules and rationalize it. You get$$\int e^x\sin x\ dx$$by taking the imaginary part, and for free you also get$$\int e^x\cos x\ dx$$by taking the real part.
 
I actually have in mind the following:

You can show that the following is true:

Suppose that [itex]\dfrac{d^2f}{dx^2}=nf[/itex] and [itex]\dfrac{d^2g}{dx^2}=mg[/itex], that is if the functions are constant multiple of themselves, and [itex]m \neq n[/itex], then the integral of the product [itex]fg[/itex] is given by

[itex]\displaystyle\int fg dx = \frac{f\frac{dg}{dx}-\frac{df}{dx}g}{m-n} + C[/itex].

Note that there is no need to carry out any integration!