I When is a water surface not dispersive?

AI Thread Summary
Water waves generated by a raindrop create a pulse of all frequencies, but in shallow water, higher frequencies travel faster, leading to a chirp effect. This contrasts with the concept that shallow waves should not disperse, raising confusion about the raindrop's behavior. In deeper water, gravity's influence causes low-frequency waves to move faster, suggesting a balance between shallow and deep water effects may exist. The discussion clarifies that the ripples from raindrops are capillary waves, dominated by surface tension, rather than gravitational waves. Understanding the interplay between these forces is crucial for achieving non-dispersive wave behavior in various water depths.
Daniel Petka
Messages
147
Reaction score
16
TL;DR Summary
Shallow water waves => high freqs faster, deep water waves => low freqs faster. When are low freqs and high freqs equally fast = no dispersion?
For my project, I need water waves of all frequencies to move at the same speed. I read this article, but struggled to grasp some concepts. The key idea of the article is that a raindrop hitting a water surface basically creates a pulse containing all the frequencies, and since the water is very shallow, the high frequencies move faster, which creates the chirp. There is something I am confusing, since according to wikipedia, shallow waves should have no dispersion, but the raindrop clearly shows otherwise.

Then, there is another part in the article which I don't get:

" Raindrops may react differently in other situations. Imagine that rain is hitting a lake or ocean – or those deep pothole puddles that require galoshes. Here, the raindrop hits the water, but the force due to gravity becomes more important. It moves waves of all sizes at the same speed which may overpower the rippling effect due to the surface force. "

But don't deep water waves disperse too? Low frequencies move faster in deep water.. The only thing that makes sense to me rn, is that there has to be some sweet spot where the effects of shallow water (high freq faster) and deep water (low freq faster) cancel out?.The article shows a perfect non-dispersive wave when the force of gravity goes up, but, of course the model is incomplete. The math here is a bit over my head, I would highly appreciate any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, the ripple effect that the article is talking about are not gravitational waves, but capillary waves. They are dominated by surface tension. These waves are much faster apparently.

Gravity waves in shallow water (depth much less than wave length) indeed do not disperse, so all frequencies move indeed at the same speed.

Gravity waves in deep water do disperse, there the higher wavelength (lower frequency) waves are fastest.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top