When to Parametrise: Explaining b(iii)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a system of equations and the necessity of using parameters to express solutions, particularly in part b(iii) of the problem. Participants are exploring the implications of having infinite solutions and the role of parameters in representing these solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion about the necessity of parametrization, questioning why it is needed when a solution seems attainable. Others discuss the implications of having an infinite number of solutions and the process of eliminating variables to set one as a parameter.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the nature of the solutions and the conditions under which parameters are used. There is a recognition that the system does not yield a unique solution, and guidance is offered regarding the use of parameters to express the relationships between variables.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference previous parts of the problem, indicating that the system's determinant is zero, leading to either no solutions or an infinite number of solutions. There is also mention of the lack of clear definitions in the textbook regarding parametrization.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



matrix1.jpg


I've done the first parts. b(iii) I don't understand, the mark scheme uses a parameter to solve it. (x=t). I don't understand why it's necessary, actually I can get a solution? The textbook is rubbish that's why I'm asking so much. An explanation would be good.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because when p=1,q=8 and r=0, 24p-3q-r=0 right?


So in the augmented matrix, you will have an entire row of zeroes. Which means you will have an infinite number of solutions, which will all depend on a parameter,t.
 
How exactly do you do it? Does matter which you parametrise? the text doesn't give a clear definition and explanation.

Here's the example

solve
x-3y+4z=4
2x-y+3z=8
3x+y+2x=12

Solution:

To eliminate y (3)x3 + (1)

10x+10z=40

(2)+(3)

5x+5z=40

Setting z=t, a parameter gives x=4-1. Substituting in equation 3, 12-3t + y + 2t=12

y=t

{x,y,z} = {4,0,0} + t{-1,1,1} A common line.
 
No it doesn't really matter which one you set as t.

Just once you eliminate one variable from the three equations and then make one equation from the remaining two, you can set either as the parameter and get the same answer.
 
Back in (bi) you showed that the given system of equations never has a unique solution, presumably by showing that the determinant of the coefficient matrix was 0. (a= b so (a-b)= 0)

So for given p, q, r, the system either has no solution or has an infinite number of solutions. In (bii) you showed that if 24p- 3q- r= 0, the system is "consistent", so has at least one solution and so has and infinite number of solutions.

Now, with p= 1, q= 8, and r= 0 24p- 3q- r= 24(1)- 3(8)- 0= 0 so this system has an infinite number of solutions. You cannot expect to get a unique solution. You need a parameter to get all solutions. Basically, you cannot solve for specific values of x, y, and z but you can solve for two of them in terms of the other one. Use that one as parameter.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Back in (bi) you showed that the given system of equations never has a unique solution, presumably by showing that the determinant of the coefficient matrix was 0. (a= b so (a-b)= 0)

So for given p, q, r, the system either has no solution or has an infinite number of solutions. In (bii) you showed that if 24p- 3q- r= 0, the system is "consistent", so has at least one solution and so has and infinite number of solutions.

Now, with p= 1, q= 8, and r= 0 24p- 3q- r= 24(1)- 3(8)- 0= 0 so this system has an infinite number of solutions. You cannot expect to get a unique solution. You need a parameter to get all solutions. Basically, you cannot solve for specific values of x, y, and z but you can solve for two of them in terms of the other one. Use that one as parameter.


It doesn't seem to work when I try to do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K