If we have a fly in a room, its position respect to some frame of reference will change with time, so if we want to describe the fly's movement with a parametrized curve, it is easy to see the convenience of taking time as the parameter.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I read that we can also take the length of the curve as a parameter and it is not dificult to follow formally the equations by which we put the original parameter -time- in terms of this new parameter. My question is: when or why is better to work with arc length as parameter, instead of time?

Thanks in advance.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# When we use arc length as a parameter

Loading...

Similar Threads - length parameter | Date |
---|---|

B Length of the graph of e^x | Nov 5, 2016 |

I What is the purpose of Arc-Length Parameterization? | Sep 18, 2016 |

Arc length in polar coordinates | Feb 10, 2016 |

Arc length | Mar 14, 2015 |

Arc length of a stadium billiard | Jan 24, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**