Where do the heavier elements come from, such as those found in planets?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kaldanis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Planets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of heavier elements found in planets compared to the composition of the sun. Participants explore the processes of stellar evolution, supernovae, and planet formation, questioning how these factors contribute to the differing elemental compositions within the solar system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the sun is primarily composed of hydrogen and helium, with a small fraction of heavier elements, raising questions about the differing compositions of planets.
  • One participant suggests that heavier elements are produced in supernovae of earlier Population II stars, indicating a historical context for the solar system's formation.
  • Another participant explains that the formation of terrestrial planets requires different materials than those found in the sun, as they could not maintain the same composition due to gravitational binding issues.
  • There is acknowledgment that while heavier elements are produced in supernovae, the exact details of their contributions from different types of supernovae remain uncertain.
  • Participants discuss the composition of asteroids, suggesting they share similarities with planets due to their formation from the same primordial material, but have undergone different processes leading to their current states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that heavier elements are produced in supernovae and that the solar system formed from a common cloud of matter. However, there are differing views on the specifics of how planet formation affects elemental composition, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact processes involved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions about the processes of planet formation and the contributions of various stellar events to the elemental makeup of the solar system. The exact mechanisms and details of these processes are not fully resolved.

Kaldanis
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Something similar to this came up in a lecture but it wasn't explained very well. From wikipedia it seems that our sun is made up of 74.9% Hydrogen and 23.8% Helium. The final 1.3% is made up of heavier elements such as oxygen, carbon, neon, and iron.

If the the entire solar system condensed out of the same cloud of matter, how come the planets are composed of such different materials to the sun? Where do the other elements come from?

I heard that heavier elements were thought to be made in supernovae, but then also heard that that was just a theory made to hide the fact that no one really knows. Does this mean that there would have been a previous star in this general area in space we occupy that went supernova, then our current solar system was created out of the remains?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Kaldanis said:
Does this mean that there would have been a previous star in this general area in space we occupy that went supernova, then our current solar system was created out of the remains?

Pretty much, yes. Sol is a recent Population I star. The heavier elements were fused in the supernovae of more ancient Population II stars. (larger number = earlier star)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_population
 
Kaldanis said:
If the the entire solar system condensed out of the same cloud of matter, how come the planets are composed of such different materials to the sun? Where do the other elements come from?
Good question. The answer is in planet formation---you couldn't make planets the size of Earth ('terrestrial planets') with the same composition as the sun, because they wouldn't stay bound together. The 'gas-giants' are basically the smallest objects you can form in this environment that are gas dominated, but they still require a more dense core to have formed.

Kaldanis said:
I heard that heavier elements were thought to be made in supernovae, but then also heard that that was just a theory made to hide the fact that no one really knows.
Heavier elements are definitely produced in supernovae, and the numbers do work out quite well. That isn't to say that all of the details are worked out, for example, the exact contribution of different types of supernovae aren't perfectly worked out... This isn't my field of expertise, but I'm sure there are lots of details that need to be filled in.
 
The sun has plenty of heavy elements, but, captured the majority of the hydrogen and helium available in the primordial solar system. This gives it a higher fraction of these elements - especially compared to the terrestrial planets.
 
Thank you. So should all the objects in the asteroid belts be composed of similar materials to the planets?
 
Kaldanis said:
Thank you. So should all the objects in the asteroid belts be composed of similar materials to the planets?
Welllll, similar, yes. They came from the same gas and dust that formed the solar system, but have been subjected to different processes.

eg. the inner planets are all rocky, the outer planets are (mostly) gaseous due to these different processes too.

But yes, the asteroids are thought to be a planetoid that might never have formed due to Jupiter's interference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K