Which book is the best for an introductory level approach to GR?

  • Context: Relativity 
  • Thread starter Thread starter UnderLaplacian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Gr Introduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on selecting the best introductory textbook for General Relativity (GR), specifically comparing works by Bernard Schutz, David d'Inverno, and others. Participants emphasize the need for rigor in tensor analysis, suggesting that d'Inverno's treatment may not meet this standard. Recommendations include O'Neill's and Straumann's texts for a more rigorous approach, alongside free resources like Matthias Blau's lecture notes. The consensus is that while Schutz is favored, personal preference plays a significant role in textbook selection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic tensor analysis concepts
  • Familiarity with General Relativity fundamentals
  • Knowledge of academic textbook evaluation criteria
  • Ability to access and utilize online academic resources
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore O'Neill's "Semi-Riemannian Geometry" for a comprehensive understanding of GR
  • Read N. Straumann's "General Relativity" for a rigorous treatment of tensor analysis
  • Review Matthias Blau's free lecture notes on General Relativity for supplementary learning
  • Visit local libraries to evaluate different GR textbooks for personal preference
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying General Relativity and tensor analysis, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of rigorous mathematical approaches in GR.

UnderLaplacian
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Which book among Bernard Schutz , Stephani and d'Inverno is the best for an introductory level approach to GR ? I have read some tensor analysis from d'Inverno and have not found its treatment rigorous enough .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are looking for rigor on the tensor analysis part, I suggest picking up a separate textbook in tensor analysis. In general, GR textbooks - at least at an introductory level - will tend to give you a short crash course on tensor analysis sufficient to get you through the basics but not much more.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Student100
UnderLaplacian said:
? I have read some tensor analysis from d'Inverno and have not found its treatment rigorous enough .
Could you explain this statement a bit more? I am not sure what you mean by 'not rigorous enough.'

Are you looking for something like https://www.amazon.com/dp/0226870332/?tag=pfamazon01-20, O'Neill, https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521537800/?tag=pfamazon01-20 (or https://www.amazon.com/dp/1107032865/?tag=pfamazon01-20), https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199230722/?tag=pfamazon01-20 (or https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199666466/?tag=pfamazon01-20?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
I like Schutz, but what you may like could be vastly different. You should check out these texts from the library and see which fits your preferred style of textbook.

If you want to a "rigorous" treatment of tensor analysis you're going to have to look elsewhere like Orodruin said.
 
I don't know what you mean by "rigorous" either. Maybe you mean a more modern exposition of tensor analysis? Then perhaps the book by Straumann is good

N. Straumann, General Relativity, Springer (2013) (2nd edition)
 
Sorry for the vague wording of my question . Thanks for all your suggestions though . A prof. in the high energy physics dept. of my university gave me the same advice that Orodruin did .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K