Which eigenvalue has multiplicity greater than 1 ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The eigenvalues of the matrix are determined to be -2, 2, and 1, with the eigenvalue 2 having an algebraic multiplicity of 2 and a geometric multiplicity of 1. This discrepancy indicates that the matrix cannot be diagonalized due to insufficient eigenvectors. The characteristic polynomial is x^4 - 3x^3 - 2x^2 + 12x - 8, confirming the multiplicity of the eigenvalues. The discussion concludes that the matrix is similar to the Jordan Normal Form, specifically represented as [[2, 1, 0], [0, 2, 0], [0, 0, 1]].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with characteristic polynomials
  • Knowledge of algebraic and geometric multiplicity
  • Basic concepts of matrix diagonalization and Jordan Normal Form
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors using characteristic polynomials
  • Learn about the implications of algebraic vs. geometric multiplicity in matrix theory
  • Explore the concept of Jordan Normal Form and its applications
  • Investigate methods for constructing invertible matrices from eigenvectors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone involved in matrix theory or eigenvalue problems will benefit from this discussion.

sid9221
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33103477/question.png

I have determined the eigenvalues which are -2, 2 and 1 respectively.

I'm pretty sure that the one with multiplicity of 2 is the, the eigenvalue = 2 as it occur's twice in the diagnol. But I don't think that's a concrete enough reason.

Any ideas how to proceed ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sid9221 said:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33103477/question.png

I have determined the eigenvalues which are -2, 2 and 1 respectively.

I'm pretty sure that the one with multiplicity of 2 is the, the eigenvalue = 2 as it occur's twice in the diagnol. But I don't think that's a concrete enough reason.
I don't think it's even a correct reason, let alone being concrete enough.

Since you now have the eigenvalues, row reduce the matrix A - λI, substituting for λ each of your eigenvalues. For one value, the row-reduced matrix will have a solution space that is two-dimensional. For the other two values, the solution space will be one-dimensional.
sid9221 said:
Any ideas how to proceed ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, worked it out and it makes sense. Turns out 2 is the one with multiplicity equal to 2.

The other part of the question ask's for a 4x4 invertible matrix P and an upper triangular matrix T such that T=P^-1 A P.


Now the problem with that is that any combination of the eigenvectors to form P would involve 2identical columns(as the multiplicity is 2), hence the matrix would not be invertible. So am I missing something ?
 
Check your work. In my work, λ = 2 has multiplicity 1, and the associated eigenvector is <1, 0, -1, 1>T.
 
Mark44 said:
Check your work. In my work, λ = 2 has multiplicity 1, and the associated eigenvector is <1, 0, -1, 1>T.

Are you sure ? Too recheck I plugged the values into an applet to find eigen values and vectors and here is the result...

Characteristic polynomial:
x^4 - 3x^3 - 2x^2 + 12x - 8

Real eigenvalues:
{-2, 1, 2, 2}

Eigenvector of eigenvalue -2:
(1, 1, 0, 0)
Eigenvector of eigenvalue 1:
(0, 0, -1, 1)
Eigenvector of eigenvalue 2:
(1, 0, -1, 1)
Eigenvector of eigenvalue 2:
(1, 0, -1, 1)


So that's multiplicity 2 for the eigenvalue 2 ?

Also any matrix formed with these would be not invertible(2 identical columns) so how do I work around that when creating an invertible matrix ?
 
There are two kinds of multiplicities: algebraic and geometric. The algebraic multiplicity of the eigenvalue 2 is two, because the λ - 2 factor in the characteristic equation occurs to power two. The geometric multiplicity of this eigenvalue is one, because there is only a single eigenvector for λ = 2.

The upshot is that I don't think you can diagonalize matrix A because there aren't enough eigenvectors.
 
Right. If one is an eigenvalue with both algeraic and geometric multiplicity 1 and 2 is an eigenvalue with algebraic multiplicity 2 but its geometric multiplicity is only 1, then it is similar to the "Jordan Normal Form"
\begin{bmatrix}2 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\end{bmatrix}
but cannot be diagonalized.
 
sid9221 said:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33103477/question.png

I have determined the eigenvalues which are -2, 2 and 1 respectively.

I'm pretty sure that the one with multiplicity of 2 is the, the eigenvalue = 2 as it occur's twice in the diagnol. But I don't think that's a concrete enough reason.

Any ideas how to proceed ?

In general, the method you try (viz., knowing the eigenvectors and then determining the eigenvalues) will only tell you about multiplicity in case some of your eigenvector equations have more than one linearly-independent solution. For some matrices, that happens, but for others it does not. When the dimensionality of the eigenvector space is less than the n (for an nxn matrix) the only sure way to proceed is to determine the characteristic polynomial of the matrix, to determine the multiplicity of its roots.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K