Programs Theoretical Physics vs Math: Which is Best?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the choice between pursuing a degree in theoretical physics or a joint honors degree with a focus on mathematics. It emphasizes that theoretical physics is not a singular field but encompasses various branches, each requiring different mathematical approaches. The consensus suggests that while theoretical physics relies heavily on mathematics, the specific mathematical skills needed can vary widely across different subfields. A double degree in mathematics may not be beneficial, as it could lead to studying irrelevant mathematical concepts instead of focusing on the essential skills required for a specific area of physics. A degree in theoretical physics is seen as more advantageous, as it provides targeted mathematical training relevant to the field, ensuring that students learn what they need to know in a practical context.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Because theoretical physics I've heard is heavily mathematical based, would it better to have a degree in theoretical physics - where you may get the oppurtunity to specialise more, or to do a joint honours with more pure mathemetatical modules?

thanks a lot for any advice :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


First, you need to consider that there is no "theoretical physics" per se. Rather, for each branch of physics (condensed matter, materials, optics, atoms&molecules/chemical, biological, particle physics, cosmology,...) there are experimental and theoretical ways to look at them. Each of them has experimentalists and theorists (and the people within a field talk more to each other than theorists of different fields!). The problem now is that while almost all theoretical physics is using large amounts of math, the concrete subfields of math can vary widely between the branches (apart from the basics). And you will only learn what you really need to know once you start working in the field.

I personally consider obtaining a double degree rather pointless; it is much more effective to put the time you'd put into this additional degree into studying your actual field of work. While doing that, you of course need to pick up all the mathematical/programming/chemical/engineering/biology/whatever expertise you require. But the difference is that in this case you *know* what you need to learn, and why, and you're not just studying random stuff.
 


cgk said:
I personally consider obtaining a double degree rather pointless; it is much more effective to put the time you'd put into this additional degree into studying your actual field of work. While doing that, you of course need to pick up all the mathematical/programming/chemical/engineering/biology/whatever expertise you require. But the difference is that in this case you *know* what you need to learn, and why, and you're not just studying random stuff.

I totally agree - Mathematics is a very broad field and you may end up doing mostly mathematics that is of no use whatever to the physics you are studying. Mathematics and Physics departments are usually completely separate and Math professors have no motivation to make their subject interesting to physics students. In a theoretical physics degree you will be steered towards the mathematics that is useful and motivating to your physics studies.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top