Which Marble Bounces Higher, Steel on Steel or Steel on Glass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffgilville
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
AI Thread Summary
Dropping a steel marble onto a steel plate results in a higher bounce compared to dropping it onto a glass plate, as the marble tends to penetrate the glass rather than bounce. The bounce height is influenced by the elasticity of the collision, where energy losses can occur due to permanent deformation, heat conversion, or residual deformation. Analyzing non-ideal collisions, where the marbles do not collide at their centers of mass, introduces complications such as uneven energy distribution and altered trajectories. This can affect the accuracy of bounce height predictions. Overall, the material properties and collision dynamics play crucial roles in determining bounce height.
buffgilville
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
1) If you dropped a steel marble onto a steel plate and then dropped a steel marble onto a glass plate, which would you expect to bounce higher? Why?

2) Suppose that a projectile marble and target marble do not collide with their centers of mass equidistant from the floor. What problems in analyzing this experiment are caused by this non-ideal collision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
buffgilville said:
1) If you dropped a steel marble onto a steel plate and then dropped a steel marble onto a glass plate, which would you expect to bounce higher?
The steel on steel case.

Why?
Because the marble just went right through the glass instead of bouncing.

The reality is that it depends on how elastic the collision is. Energy losses occur if there is permanent deformation, if the deformation is converted into heat, or if there's is some residual deformation that recovers after the collision.

Suprisingly to most people, a pool ball bounces really well off a hard surface.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top