Which Method Requires Less Force to Move an Object 1.2m?

  • Thread starter Thread starter World
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining which method requires less force to move an object 1.2 meters: pushing over a rough surface, lifting directly, pushing over a smooth surface, or using an inclined plane. It concludes that pushing over a smooth surface generally requires less force due to reduced friction, while lifting directly involves overcoming gravitational force. The impact of the coefficient of kinetic friction is emphasized, indicating that without specific values, the comparison remains inconclusive. The analysis highlights that using an inclined plane can reduce the force needed due to the longer distance traveled.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of work-energy principles (W=F*d)
  • Familiarity with friction concepts, including coefficients of friction
  • Basic understanding of inclined planes and gravitational forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of different coefficients of kinetic friction on force calculations
  • Study the mechanics of inclined planes and their advantages in reducing force
  • Explore the relationship between work, force, and distance in various scenarios
  • Learn about comparative analysis of forces in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding force dynamics in practical applications.

World
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which requires less force?
-pushing an object 1.2m over a rough surface
-lifting an object to a height of 1.2m
-pushing an object 1.2m over a smooth surface
-lifting an object to a height of 1.2m using an inclined plane


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



Pushing an object over a rough surface is going to require more force since friction is opposing the applied force. Lifting the object directly upwards is going to involve gravity soo.. I am down to pushing over a smooth surface or lifting using an inclined plane. My guess for the answer to this question is currently pushing over a smooth surface since there is not much friction involved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Unfortunately, we need more information that is provided.

It is very likely that the coefficient of kinetic friction could make it so that the work done to move along the rough surface is greater than that required to move the object against gravity.

I do not want to completely solve the problem, but I will give a few important points:
1. Moving with friction obviously involves more work than without friction (and since W=F*d, more force).
2. If the inclined plane is frictionless, the same amount of work is required to move it up the plane as directly up. Gravity is a conservative force, so it doesn't matter if you go directly up, or "sideways." Gravity will still do the same amount of negative work, and so the same amount of force will be required (again, W=f*d).
 
1-pushing an object 1.2m over a rough surface
2-lifting an object to a height of 1.2m
3 -pushing an object 1.2m over a smooth surface
4-lifting an object to a height of 1.2m using an inclined plane

1. if μ=1, frictional force =mg
2 gravitational force=mg
3. μ<1, frictional force <mg
4. less gravitational force + frictional force.
 
Hmm, now that I think of it, I might have been mistaken about the inclined plane. While it is true that the work done by gravity will be the same, it is also true that the force required to move it up the ramp will be less because the distance will be greater.

Regarding the other problem with the friction, since values are not give, we cannot solve the problem. Depending on the coefficient of kinetic friction, either moving up or moving over the surface could require a greater force.
 
Alright thanks for trying to help me out with this one. It was a question that I recently answered on a worksheet that was due for class. I ended up picking "pushing an object over a smooth surface" that seemed the most logical.

*I was really curious after I handed it in, twas why I have posted here
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K