Which OS consume least memory and HD space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silicon Waffle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory Os Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying operating systems (OS) that consume minimal memory and hard drive space while remaining functional. The scope includes various Linux distributions and comparisons with other operating systems, as well as considerations for specific hardware configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about OS options that are low in memory and disk space usage but still functional.
  • Another mentions Damn Small Linux as a well-known stripped-down Linux variant.
  • A participant discusses ARCH ARM Linux, highlighting its suitability for minimal hardware configurations and suggesting that definitions of "completely functional" may vary.
  • There are mentions of Raspberry Pi 2 as an example of hardware that can run lightweight OS configurations effectively.
  • One participant recommends Ubuntu for its user-friendliness and popularity, while another suggests lightweight versions like Lubuntu, Bodhi Linux, and Peppermint Linux, noting their low RAM usage on boot.
  • MS-DOS is mentioned as a technically fitting option, though compatibility issues with modern programs are noted.
  • A suggestion is made to explore real-time operating systems, with a link provided for further information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on which OS is best suited for low memory and disk usage, with no consensus reached on a single solution. Different definitions of functionality and suitability for specific hardware configurations are also discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining what "completely functional" means in the context of different OS options, indicating that assumptions about functionality may vary significantly.

Silicon Waffle
Messages
160
Reaction score
202
I am curious as to which OS and its siblings (e.g Linux={Fedora, Mint,...}) consume the least memory and HD space but sure are still perfectly functional after installed.
Thanks a lot.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
Completely functional does not have to mean every extra possible add on command and driver - ARCH ARM Linux is meant for tiny hardware configurations, like your refrigerator "brain" or the ignition system in your car. Extreme examples run a functioning kernel with just a few device drivers that occupies less than ~50MB, with addressable memory (space to run code) at about 30-50% of that value. Check out a Raspberry Pi 2 with really expanded memory -- 1.0 GB. - They are about $US40 I think.

So you may want to reconsider what makes a good 'completely functional' definition. Just like full blown Debian or Solaris? OR something else. Programming the fridge, maybe.

http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/
 
jim mcnamara said:
Check out a Raspberry Pi 2 with really expanded memory -- 1.0 GB. - They are about $US40 I think.
So you may want to reconsider what makes a good 'completely functional' definition. Just like full blown Debian or Solaris? OR something else. Programming the fridge, maybe.

http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/

I'm converting some SPI kernel device drivers (daq_gert driver for the comedi library) written for the original RPi on a RPi 2. The difference in compile speed of the 1GB models is amazing with 4 cores. If you need a full blown embedded system with Raspbian that can be stripped down to run on something even smaller it's a great choice.
 
I'd say go with Linux Ubunto. Not only is it good and many people use it, but it's free and really user friendly. :)
 
Technically MS-DOS would fit your criteria, but I think you'll have trouble with compatibility with the programs you want to run. :-p
 
Lubuntu (the lightweight version of Ubuntu), Bodhi Linux, Peppermint Linux come to mind. They all consume less than 200 Mb of RAM on boot up, have several programs pre-installed (is that what you mean by being functional?) and if you need other programs, it's very easy to install them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
11K
Replies
35
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
60
Views
11K
Replies
29
Views
5K