Which Power Supply Design Is Best for Low Noise Applications?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the design of a power supply scheme for low noise applications, specifically for an RFID reader. Participants explore two proposed designs that involve different configurations of linear and switching regulators, focusing on noise reduction and transient response. The conversation includes considerations of PCB layout, grounding, and output capacitance requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes Design 1, which includes a regulated 15V linear supply and a low noise 12V linear regulator, suggesting it may better clean up noise from the switching regulator.
  • Another participant supports Design 1, emphasizing the importance of careful PCB floorplanning and grounding to avoid shared impedance between circuits.
  • A different participant agrees to split the ground planes but focuses on filtering the input and output of the regulators, indicating a preference for Design 1.
  • Questions arise regarding the output capacitance needed for the 12V RF supply to manage load transients effectively, with a specific target deviation of 50mV.
  • One participant suggests that the regulator will primarily handle medium-frequency transients, while output capacitors will manage higher frequency transients, highlighting the importance of both capacitance value and ESR.
  • Another participant requests an example calculation for determining output capacitor value based on dI/dt.
  • Responses indicate that existing datasheet graphs may provide sufficient guidance for selecting capacitance values, with a recommendation for low ESR capacitors.
  • Additional advice is given to keep the 12V sub-regulator close to power connections and to consider the effects of parallel capacitors on ESR.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of careful design and layout for low noise applications, with a preference for Design 1 emerging. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to determining output capacitance, and multiple viewpoints on the handling of transients and capacitor selection are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific calculations for output capacitance and the transient response characteristics of the regulators. The discussion reflects varying assumptions about the roles of different components in managing noise and transients.

j777
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to decide how to design the power scheme that will supply the various voltages within my project. The two big requirements are that there is a single main supply, regulated 5V @ 1A (typ. load .5A), and extremely low noise regulated 12V @ 1A (typ. load .4A). The low noise 12V is for an RFID reader that reads 134.2kHz transponders.

Below are the two designs that I'm contemplating.

Design 1: Main supply is regulated 15V linear supply;5V switching regulator (260kHz switching freq.) with ferrite beads on both input and output to reduce conducted noise;12V low noise linear regulator (LT1763) with filtering added.

Design 2: Main supply is regulated 12V linear supply;5V switching regulator (260kHz switching freq.) with ferrite beads on both input and output to reduce conducted noise;filter 12V main supply to provide extremely low noise 12V

Design 2 is the least complex but the second linear regulator in design 1 should help to further clean up the 15V main supply and attenuate any noise caused by the 5V switching regulator.

Please offer your thoughts on these two designs and which one you might choose. Any and all thoughts/recommendations are appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In my experience, you definitely need a separate regulated rail for the RF analog section, and you need to be very, very careful how you floorplan and lay out your PCB. You will want to bring the power input (15Vdc) in near the the middle of the board floorplan, and have the RF regulator feed the RF circuitry in one direction, and the other 5V regulator feed the other circuitry in the other direction. You do NOT want to have any shared impedance in the grounding of the two circuits, and you might consider even cutting the two planes apart, except for the one bridge area where the signals cross from one section to the other (and yes, filter those connections).

So I'm saying Design 1 is the better option, plus you need to really think about your floorplan carefully, and be willing to spin the PCB design if you find that the first try is still not giving you the sensitivity that you want. I've seen 10's of dB lost in sensitivity by not being very careful about this.
 
Thanks for the help berkeman.

I will split the 2 planes and only bring them together right at the power input. There aren't any signals that need to cross between the 2 planes so I don't have to worry about filtering them (I will however do filtering on the input and output of the 5V and 12V regulators). The RF analog section will only contain the 12Vdc supply for the RFID reader.

I really appreciated your input and look forward to testing this design out.
 
The 12Vdc RF supply needs to handle load transients of .5A and have only a small deviation from the nominal output voltage under these conditions. What is the best way to determine how much output capacitance is required to keep the deviation within a desired limit? Say for example 50mV...
 
j777 said:
The 12Vdc RF supply needs to handle load transients of .5A and have only a small deviation from the nominal output voltage under these conditions. What is the best way to determine how much output capacitance is required to keep the deviation within a desired limit? Say for example 50mV...

I don't think you'll be supplying that extra 0.5A transient from the regulator's output capacitor -- it will be mostly through the regulator. The smoothing of medium-frequency transients in a linear regulator situation is mostly handled by the regulator itself. Higher frequency transients (like if there is a step in the output current demand) will be smoothed by the output capacitors. The value of the capacitor is important there, but also its ESR (equivilant series resistance) value. If you know the dI/dt value of your current steps, then you can figure out the value of the output capacitor and the ESR required. Check the linear regulator's datasheet to find its transient response characteristics.
 
The only information that I could find in the datasheet is depicted in the attached image. Would you mind giving an example of how you would calculate the value of an output capacitor given dI/dt?
 

Attachments

  • trans_response.JPG
    trans_response.JPG
    43 KB · Views: 515
Those graphs are already showing triensents around 50mV, so the capacitances they list are probably fine for you to start with. Those transients are also almost full scale (off to on), versus starting at 0.5A and having a transient to 1A. An output current transient will generally be handled better by the regulator if it is already conducting a pretty good current before the set up. Be sure to use low ESR caps like the tantalums they mention in the figures.
 
It will help to keep your 12v sub regulator on the same ground plane as your module and as close to the power connections as possible.
Also, ESR is subject to parallel resistance rules.
All else being equal two 50uf caps will work better than one 100uf cap.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
5K