- 19,978
- 11,076
Greg Bernhardt submitted a new PF Insights post
Which Scientist Said What
Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
Which Scientist Said What
Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
Which Scientist Said What - Comments
- Context: Insights
- Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Scientist
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
32 replies · 4K views
Discussion
- 1,242
- 512
6 ...
- 19,978
- 11,076
If I hadn't made the quiz I think I could have gotten 3 
anachin6000
- 50
- 3
4... And I guessed all of them... ehh...
- 20,819
- 28,466
7 - however, I guessed a lot and Oppenheimer made me angry for I didn't chose him because it was TOO obvious
- 1,242
- 512
Some I'd never heard before. But there were two that I have read many times in books or articles and still got wrong.
- 20,819
- 28,466
1 correct answer (Newton) was due to a linked Feynman lecture here on PF I completely enjoyed 3 days agoSamy_A said:
(I belong to those people to whom it's easier to remember the unimportant stuff.)
- 3,202
- 3,823
7. Some were guesses but a few I missed by not going with my first reaction.
- 3,306
- 2,531
I managed an 8. I always liked the historical side of things. Teaching and including historical anecdotes helps a lot.
- 15,171
- 3,378
10.
I guessed #10 had to be Curie. I didn't think theorists would talk about "a scientist in his laboratory"!
I guessed #10 had to be Curie. I didn't think theorists would talk about "a scientist in his laboratory"!
- 3,306
- 2,531
atyy said:
10 is pretty good.
- 4,476
- 2,511
10
I got 1, 3, 7 and 8 wrong
I got 1, 3, 7 and 8 wrong
UncertaintyAjay
- 230
- 31
6. Only knew 2,4 and 7 though. Guessed everything else.
- 5,628
- 1,777
Six of one (half-dozen of the other).UncertaintyAjay said:
UncertaintyAjay
- 230
- 31
Sorry, didn't get that.Bystander said:
- 5,628
- 1,777
Inadvertent copy of your post (previous).UncertaintyAjay said:
UncertaintyAjay
- 230
- 31
Right. Haha
- 23,753
- 5,953
7, all by "educated" guessing.
Frimus
- 64
- 55
8
I like #5 which I didn't know before and I erroneously attributed it to Richard Feynman.
I would have expected such a statement just from him :-)
I like #5 which I didn't know before and I erroneously attributed it to Richard Feynman.
I would have expected such a statement just from him :-)
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,193
- 10,278
7, with a lot of guessing. I was only sure of 2.
Hornbein
Gold Member
- 4,139
- 3,300
4. I've heard most of them before. Bad luck in my 50/50 guesses.
- 19,385
- 15,622
I got 10 of them, which amazed me since I was guessing on all but a couple
DiracPool
- 1,254
- 514
5/12
- 3,638
- 1,014
9/12
4 I acutally knew. Quite pleased with better than random results for the rest.
Mostly based on having some idea of many of their personalities.
1 wrong. It didn't sound like anything a serious scientist would say, so I put down Cabeus, the only one I have never heard of.
6 wrong, but it was half and half getting between Bohr and Azimov
7 right. Guessed Hawking, based on banality of thought and expression
10 right. Clearly said by an experimental scientist
11 right. Dirac had that sort of philistine purism and was essentially autistic; maths was beautiful to him, but not music because it had too many unnecessary or arbitrary twiddly bits; the unliteralness of poetic meaning he probably would have been uncomfortable with.
12 wrong. I put Bardeen of whom I know little. I thought a bit about Feynman, but decided it was a tad too banal for him, and not quite what he would have said, but he did also play to the crowd bit.
4 I acutally knew. Quite pleased with better than random results for the rest.
Mostly based on having some idea of many of their personalities.
1 wrong. It didn't sound like anything a serious scientist would say, so I put down Cabeus, the only one I have never heard of.
6 wrong, but it was half and half getting between Bohr and Azimov
7 right. Guessed Hawking, based on banality of thought and expression
10 right. Clearly said by an experimental scientist
11 right. Dirac had that sort of philistine purism and was essentially autistic; maths was beautiful to him, but not music because it had too many unnecessary or arbitrary twiddly bits; the unliteralness of poetic meaning he probably would have been uncomfortable with.
12 wrong. I put Bardeen of whom I know little. I thought a bit about Feynman, but decided it was a tad too banal for him, and not quite what he would have said, but he did also play to the crowd bit.
Gold Member
- 3,489
- 1,173
4..(Newton, Einstein, Openheimer and Feynman). Knew first 3(Openheimer was obvious
) and guessed Feynman.
) and guessed Feynman.
giulioo
- 7
- 0
7/12
like many of the others commenters i did guess almost all of them (which amazes me).
well, it was pondered guessing :)
like many of the others commenters i did guess almost all of them (which amazes me).
well, it was pondered guessing :)
- 16,225
- 2,895
10
The Vinh
- 46
- 1
12/12. Using Google :)
xAxis
- 223
- 4
wow. How did you people got these high results. I got 3, one of which (q. 6) was educated guess.
1 - Impossible to guess. All pre 19th century scientists were admirers of the laws in nature. I would never expect Kepler or Cabeus to say that. I thought maybe Ferma somehow (he was an atheist), but was 90% sure it was Wheeler. Wrong
3 - Knew it was not Descartes, but didn't expect it to be Galileo
5 - Knew it couldn't be Feynman nor Curie (must be someone who was alive when computers made a boom), and really looked more something that Hawking would say than Sagan (as epenguin remarked based on banality of the expression) and a certain dose of humour characteristic to Hawking. Wrong
6 - Impossible to miss in my opinion. I mean, would a real scientist say something like this? :)
7 - Something really archaically sounding, so I chose the oldest, Maxwell. But wrong, it was the youngest, Hawking.
And so on, each question until 11, would eliminate at least one, but all wrong.
11 - “In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it’s the exact opposite.” - I've heard this one before, and I liked it very much. Something that actually a poet would say. But I couldn't remember who sad it. I knew it was neither Tesla nor Born. (For people who don't know Tesla exquisitely well, this is a red herring, as he is known to have liked poetry and has translated some of the Serbian Poems into English) I thought of Dirac's social awkwardness and autism, vs Pauli's love for night life and shady bars and decided it should be Pauli. Wrong
12 - Again, the right answer, Feynman is known to have had many interests other then the physics. He traveled a lot and socialised with great variety of people. He practised art and made and sold some nice paintings, played bongos and was in a samba marching band, and is the author of three books. How likely is that he would have sad that "a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy.”? But he did.
Greg, when are you going to make some easier quiz? Something like "Who sad "Alea Jacta Est" ", or "To be or not to be". :)
1 - Impossible to guess. All pre 19th century scientists were admirers of the laws in nature. I would never expect Kepler or Cabeus to say that. I thought maybe Ferma somehow (he was an atheist), but was 90% sure it was Wheeler. Wrong
3 - Knew it was not Descartes, but didn't expect it to be Galileo
5 - Knew it couldn't be Feynman nor Curie (must be someone who was alive when computers made a boom), and really looked more something that Hawking would say than Sagan (as epenguin remarked based on banality of the expression) and a certain dose of humour characteristic to Hawking. Wrong
6 - Impossible to miss in my opinion. I mean, would a real scientist say something like this? :)
7 - Something really archaically sounding, so I chose the oldest, Maxwell. But wrong, it was the youngest, Hawking.
And so on, each question until 11, would eliminate at least one, but all wrong.
11 - “In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it’s the exact opposite.” - I've heard this one before, and I liked it very much. Something that actually a poet would say. But I couldn't remember who sad it. I knew it was neither Tesla nor Born. (For people who don't know Tesla exquisitely well, this is a red herring, as he is known to have liked poetry and has translated some of the Serbian Poems into English) I thought of Dirac's social awkwardness and autism, vs Pauli's love for night life and shady bars and decided it should be Pauli. Wrong
12 - Again, the right answer, Feynman is known to have had many interests other then the physics. He traveled a lot and socialised with great variety of people. He practised art and made and sold some nice paintings, played bongos and was in a samba marching band, and is the author of three books. How likely is that he would have sad that "a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy.”? But he did.
Greg, when are you going to make some easier quiz? Something like "Who sad "Alea Jacta Est" ", or "To be or not to be". :)
Nyborr
7, almost all of them were guesses.