Which Version of Sakurai's Quantum Book Should I Get?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geezer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the various versions of Sakurai's quantum mechanics textbook, specifically the second edition, and whether the differences between these versions justify the price variations. Participants explore the implications of different editions, their physical characteristics, and the context of their use in graduate-level courses.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over the existence of multiple versions of the same edition, suggesting that price differences may indicate varying conditions of used books.
  • There is mention of the distinction between Sakurai's two known quantum mechanics books, "Modern Quantum Mechanics" and "Advanced Quantum Mechanics," with uncertainty about the existence of a second edition for the latter.
  • One participant warns about the international edition being a lower-quality softcover version, which may not be suitable for U.S. students.
  • Another participant shares their experience with the binding quality of their hardback copy of the second edition, noting issues with durability.
  • Several participants discuss the visual differences between the first and second editions, particularly the color of the covers, as a means of identification.
  • There is a clarification of what constitutes a graduate course, with some participants noting differences in terminology and educational structure between the U.S. and European systems.
  • One participant provides a summary of the major revisions in the second edition, highlighting updates in various quantum mechanics topics.
  • There is a correction regarding the identification of editions, with one participant realizing they have a revised edition rather than the second edition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the differences between the versions of the second edition or the implications of these differences for their studies. Multiple competing views remain regarding the identification of editions and the appropriateness of various versions for graduate courses.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of editions and revisions, as well as the implications of different educational systems on the terminology used for courses. There are unresolved questions about the quality and suitability of various book versions.

Geezer
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
The required textbook for my grad level quantum course is Sakurai's quantum book, 2nd edition. However, there seem to be several versions of the 2nd edition text, ranging from $25 to $155. Is the newest version of the 2nd edition book significantly different/better from other versions that it's worth paying more for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ask your professor.
 
I'm a little confused by the question, since there shouldn't be different versions of the same edition of a book, as far as I know. A different version would mean a different edition.

Could the price range mean that some of these books are actually used, and in varying condition?
 
Also note that Sakurai has at least two QM books I'm aware of, they are not the same.

"Modern quantum mechanics" and "advanced quantum mechanics".
But I'm note sure there IS a 2nd Ed of the latter book?

You better check with the teacher which book you should get. I'm not sure what you mean by graduate book though. I wouldn't call the first book a graduate book, not sure about the latter. The first one I used for undergraduate course (2nd course in QM). For relativistic QM and QED we had a teacher who relied on his own notes completely, but he referred to a ranged of optional books.

Not having seen it, my hunch is that "graduate book" must refer to the sedon book? but I haven't read it

/Fredrik
 
It's probably the difference between the US and international editions. The international edition is the same book, but softcover and printed on very cheap paper. It's not technically supposed to be sold to the US, but many students end up with one by ordering the cheapest version they could find, without realizing what they were getting. I got a few that way through Amazon vendors (both Sakurai books). Just a warning, they took two months to arrive (glad I ordered early) and showed up wrapped in an Indian newspaper and twine. Probably traveled most of the way by mule. :)
 
Interesting, I just checked my old book and I've got second Ed "modern quantum mechanics". It's a proper hardback but it cracked in the binding so the book is pretty much in two pieces, which happened when the book was new, long time ago by now. It's unusual for hardback books to crack like that so the quality of the binding was bad. I don't see anything in it labelling as international edition though. ISBN = 0-201-53929-2. i bought mine new off the sheld in a big bookstore in Sweden though. So no mule import I think ;)

/Fredrik
 
I had used Sakurai's Modern QM for a 1st-year grad level course. (In the USA, at SUNY Stony Brook, about 20 years ago.) There is no edition # on the book, so I presume it's 1st ed.
 
The preface to my second Ed of Saurai says these are the diffs (snipped):

"The major revisions are...
...reworking temp-independencet perturbation theory for degenerate case
...refinements on lifetime broadening in stark effect and additional explanations of phase shifts at resonances, optical theorem and non-renormalizable state
...reworking of coloumb scatering (to shorter text, relegating math to appendix C)

Though not a major part of the text, some of hte additions were deemed necessary to take into account developments in quantum mechanics sinces novembe 1, 1982
"

There are also a couple of supplements at end of book.

/Fredrik
 
I also used Sakurai's "Modern QM" for my first semester graduate quantum course a few years ago.

I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that the first edition of the book has a black cover showing a block-diagonal matrix in red. In the second edition, the colors are inverted. i.e. The background is red, and the matrix is in black. That's probably the easiest way to tell the editions apart.
 
  • #10
This is probably a US vs European school system thing, but what do you guys mean by graduate course? I assume it means post-graduation courses but what graduation does it refer to?

Anyone fulfilling the prerequsites are usually free to take any course they like, but I'm used to seeing "graduate course" referring to equivalent of courses for phD students etc. Most course, but not all up to say Masters degree is what would be labelled undergraduate courses here?

/Fredrik
 
  • #11
G01 said:
In the second edition, the colors are inverted. i.e. The background is red, and the matrix is in black.

Yes that's how mine look like and I've got second ed.

/Fredrik
 
  • #12
1st ed, black cover for me.

The Advanced QM book had a red cover, at least the edition being sold in the early 1990's did.

Fra said:
This is probably a US vs European school system thing, but what do you guys mean by graduate course? I assume it means post-graduation courses but what graduation does it refer to?

In the USA it means a course taken in graduate school. I.e., the student has already completed a 4-year bachelor's (=undergraduate) degree and is working toward either a master's or Ph.D degree -- usually at a different university than where the bachelor's was earned. Such students are referred to as graduate students over here; an undergraduate student is somebody working towards a 4-year bachelor's degree.

Hope that helps clear things up.
 
  • #13
Redbelly98 said:
1st ed, black cover for me.

My revised first edition has a red cover; see

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1897989#post1897989
Redbelly98 said:
The Advanced QM book had a red cover, at least the edition being sold in the early 1990's did.

When I was a student, I think that my library's copy had a wine-coloured copy, but I am far from certain. I am fairly certain, though, that it did not look like

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1897989#post1897989.
 
  • #14
I'm sorry. I just reallzed that I mixed up "revised edition" and "second edition". I indeed have the revised edition! I guess I assumed that the second edition was the "revision" of the first edition but that isn't so :)

So I have the old book I assume?

/Fredrik
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K