White Hole: What Is It & How Does It Differ from Black Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsnoob12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hole White hole
physicsnoob12
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
what is a white hole and how does it differ from a black hole?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no such thing - probably
Outside SF, a few cranks, and a bunch of theoretical astrophysicts there is no need for white holes in any current theory.

Of course it's big universe and stranger things have happened
 
ahh thank you someone was throwing the term around and i had no idea what it meant
 
A white hole and a black hole attach two locations in space-time, the black hole draws things inwards where as a white hole is were all of the material is excreted. But as stated, they are non-existent.
 
In general relativity for every solution to the field equations there exists a time reversal which also solves the field equations. Hence if black holes are solutions to the field equations so are their time reversal t--> -t. These solutions are called white holes.

The reason that we don't expect to see them in nature is because they would require very unlikely initial conditions(eg exploding matter close to a singularity). So by the second law of thermodynamics we can exclude their existence at large distances, large masses etc. However
one may expect that at very short distances with very few degrees of freedom they may contribute to the path integral in quantum gravity.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
990
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top