Whittaker's solution and separable variables

matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
So It is well known that the 2D solution to the Laplace equation can be obtained by changing to complex coordinates ##u=x+iy## and ##v=x-iy##. This can be extended to n dimensions as long as the complex coordinates chosen also solve the Laplace equation. For example in 3D

##w=i\sqrt{2}z+xcos\vartheta +iysin(\vartheta)##

along with the complex conjugate of w. This allows the 3D laplace equation to be solved in the same way as the 2D case. I.e the solution of
##\nabla^{2}f=0## can be found through

##f=g(w)+h(\tilde{w})##

A general solution to the Laplace equation is given by

##f=\int f(w,\vartheta)d\vartheta##

this is called Whittaker's solution and from this we can obtain

##f=\frac{2\pi x}{(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{3/2}}##

which is a solution to the Laplace equation...Ok so my question is I am unsure how to show that they are equivalent?

Whittaker's solution must be able to be expressed as

##f=\int f(w,\vartheta)d\vartheta=g(w)+h(\tilde{w})=\frac{2\pi x}{(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{3/2}}##

I am sure there is a simple explanation? probably involving a taylor expansion or something? but I am not sure how to get there...I believe these all have some context and relation to twistor theory and the like but before i delve cohmology etc I am hoping for an easier solution =]
Matt
 
As far as I could figure out by reading some old old document Whittaker shewed that solutions to the 3d laplace equation can be put on the form ## \int_{0}^{2\pi} f(x + iy\cos(v) + iz\sin(v)) dv ##. By pure guessing I found that

## \int_{0}^{2\pi} f(x,y,z,v) dv = \frac{2\pi x }{\left(x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)^{3/2}}## with ## f(x,y,z,v) = \left(x + iz\cos(v) + iy\sin(v)\right)^{-2}##. Now you just have to find g(w) and h(w), right?
 
Strum said:
As far as I could figure out by reading some old old document Whittaker shewed that solutions to the 3d laplace equation can be put on the form ## \int_{0}^{2\pi} f(x + iy\cos(v) + iz\sin(v)) dv ##. By pure guessing I found that

## \int_{0}^{2\pi} f(x,y,z,v) dv = \frac{2\pi x }{\left(x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)^{3/2}}## with ## f(x,y,z,v) = \left(x + iz\cos(v) + iy\sin(v)\right)^{-2}##. Now you just have to find g(w) and h(w), right?

Pretty much, but where the solution to the Laplace equation is the addition of some function ##g(w)## and ##h(\tilde{w})## where ##\tilde{w}## is the complex conjugate of ##w##...
The more I'm reading about it, it seems as if I need to look at twistor theory, global and local solutions etc...I wonder if take a laurent expansion would help, but I haven't really been able to get very far
 
Strum said:
As far as I could figure out by reading some old old document Whittaker shewed that solutions to the 3d laplace equation can be put on the form ## \int_{0}^{2\pi} f(x + iy\cos(v) + iz\sin(v)) dv ##. By pure guessing I found that

## \int_{0}^{2\pi} f(x,y,z,v) dv = \frac{2\pi x }{\left(x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)^{3/2}}## with ## f(x,y,z,v) = \left(x + iz\cos(v) + iy\sin(v)\right)^{-2}##. Now you just have to find g(w) and h(w), right?

Would you show me how you solved the integral? I appear to be having some trouble
 
Maple syntax.

f:=(x,y,z,v) -> (x + I*z*cos(v) + I*y*sin(v))^-2;
int(f(x,y,z,v),v=0..2*Pi) assuming(x,real,y,real,z,real,v,real)
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top