1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Who likes integrals? e^(trig function)

  1. Apr 12, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I'm working on a physics problem and I'm winding up with the following integral. Anyone have any clues? Contour?

    [tex]\int_{0}^{2\pi} e^{i k cos\left(\theta + k_\theta\right)} d\theta [/tex]

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I tried subbing in a bunch of u's and whatever else. I'm just plain stuck. I've been trying to get it in terms of something I can just look up in a table, but I can't. Can anyone give me a direction? I don't know whether this is a contour integral or what, but I'm fairly certain it is. If it is, it's been awhile since I've done any complex stuff and I don't have a book with me to help. So, if that's the case I'll just bail on the problem. Thanks!
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 13, 2008 #2
    Well I doubt this is going to be much help but according to my maths program it's insoluble in elementary functions in a general integral and it pops out -infinities as the answer to the definite integral in the range of 0pi and 2pi, and given theta=0pi,1pi...2pi. given anything more of a range or negative thetas or both, just increases the number of series of -infinities. If it is soluble my maths program isn't powerful enough to do it, unless your happy with the answer -infinity of course. :smile:

    This is in need of renormalisation as

    [tex]\int_0^{2\pi}e^{ik\cos({\theta}+k_\theta})\;d\theta=-\infty [/tex]

    does not converge I think or converges to -infinity :). Or if it does converge my maths program is broken.

    Hehe do you add a constant to infinity, doesn't seem much point. :biggrin: since it's still infinity.

    Anyone else got any thoughts? Is my maths program screwed again. :smile:

    Have you tried converting it to Cartesian co-ordinates, instead of polars, or is that a stupid suggestion, probably pointless? Is there any solution in Cartesians, if not I doubt there's any solution in reality either.

    Sorry I can't delete the above post so I'll have to double post.

    I'm also assuming k is a constant.
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2008
  4. Apr 13, 2008 #3
    Yep, k is constant. Well, it does take the form of a delta function, so I'm thinking it may just be 1 when Theta plus ktheta is pi/2,3pi/2, but I'm not sure. Actually, this problem was in cartesian coordinates, but it suggested to convert to spherical before integrating, haha. So, that much is a no go.
  5. Apr 13, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    If the limits are really 0 to 2pi, then it's not a delta function and it's not -infinity. It's a complex number depending on k and k_theta. E.g. if k=0 then it's value is 2pi. I don't think you are going to find an elementary expression for it's value. Are you sure you changed coordinates correctly?
  6. Apr 13, 2008 #5
    Yep, i'm certain about the change of coordinates. If it's a complex number, that's probably fine, especially if it depends on k and k_theta, that makes perfect sense, because later I have to integrate this with respect to k both k and k_theta. Would I be doing a contour integral or something to get the result that you got?

  7. Apr 13, 2008 #6
    P.S. I realize that to evaluate the k=0 case you are just integrating 1.
  8. Apr 13, 2008 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I really didn't get much, I just set k=0 so the integrand is 1. That was just a 'for instance'. I don't know how to do any other value exactly. I do know it's not divergent or a delta function, just because it's the integral of a continuous function over a closed interval. Contours won't help. If you really needed to you could integrate it numerically, but I suspect something else has gone wrong if this is just an exercise. What is the original problem?
  9. Apr 15, 2008 #8
    I've been working on my stats, going through some problems wherever I can find them. I ran into this in Reif 1.29.

    Problem statement:
    (a) Using an appropriate Dirac-delta function, find the probability density w(s) for displacements of uniform length l, but in any random direction of three-dimensional space. (Hint: Remember that the function w(s) must be such that [tex]\int\int\int w(\vec{s})d\vec{s}=1[/tex] when integrated over all space.)

    For this part I got [tex]w(\vec{s})=\frac{\delta\left(\rho - l)}{4\pi l^2}[/tex]. This made sense to me, since (1) it integrated to 1 over all space and, (2) it seemed to me that the probability should be uniform over a sphere of radius l. rho is the radius in spherical coordinates.

    (b) Use the result of part (a) to calculate [tex]Q(\vec{k})[/tex]. (Perform the integral in spherical coordinates.)

    This is where I'm winding up stuck.

    [tex]Q(\vec{k})=\int w(\vec{s}) e^{i\vec{k}\bullet \vec{s}} d^3\vec{s} [/tex]
    You can see that due to the dot product and spherical coordinates, I'm getting trig functions in the exponential. Obviously rho is easy to handle, but once I get to theta and phi I get quite stuck. The constants in the original problem above aren't exactly what I'm looking at here, but it seemed like if there was a way to compute that, I could handle the rest from there. Thanks!

    P.S. I'm willing to accept that my density is just wrong.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Who likes integrals? e^(trig function)
  1. Integral trig function (Replies: 3)