Who Planted the Car Bomb in Times Square?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bomb Car Square
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the car bomb incident in Times Square, focusing on the nature of the bomb, the intentions behind its construction, and the potential identity of the perpetrators. Participants explore various theories regarding the bomb's design, the materials used, and the implications of its amateurish assembly.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the bomb as "amateurish," questioning the likelihood of it being constructed by a well-organized terrorist group.
  • Others argue that despite its amateurish appearance, the bomb could still cause significant damage, particularly with the combination of propane and gasoline.
  • There are claims that the bomb's failure to detonate as intended suggests a possible malfunction, with some speculating about the role of fireworks as a detonator.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the bomb's construction, noting that the assembly may indicate a lack of expertise, despite the use of potentially harmful materials.
  • Some express skepticism about the credibility of eyewitness accounts, such as the hot dog vendor's report of an explosion.
  • There is a mention of other historical bombings, suggesting that effective bombs can be made with common materials, challenging the notion that military-grade explosives are necessary.
  • Concerns are raised about the intent behind the bombing, emphasizing that the mere act of planting a bomb in a public space indicates a desire to cause harm.
  • Participants note the presence of surveillance cameras in Times Square, suggesting that the perpetrators may be identified through video evidence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the bomb or the identity of the perpetrators. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of the bomb's construction and the motivations behind it.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include uncertainties about the effectiveness of the bomb's components and the reliability of eyewitness testimonies. There are also unresolved questions about the specific materials used and their potential for causing harm.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those following current events related to public safety, terrorism, and explosive devices, as well as individuals studying the psychology of fear and public response to threats.

jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2025 Award
Messages
16,107
Reaction score
8,130
Physics news on Phys.org
They are calling it "amatuerish". My first thought that it was unlikely to be an Islamic terrorst because "amateurish" isn't something that usually describes groups that are typically pretty well organized. However, the article also said that propane tanks have been used by Islamic terrorists in the past...so we'll just have to wait and see.

Times Square is buried in cameras so I'd be surprised if the police don't get a good look a the perps, at the very least.
 
Wow, that's crazy.

Also in one of the videos the hot dog vendor said there was an explosio from the car... how credible is that claim? I mean I've seen propane tanks go explode and there's no way that it would have left the vehicle in one piece. Not even a shattered window :/
 
russ_watters said:
They are calling it "amatuerish". My first thought that it was unlikely to be an Islamic terrorst because "amateurish" isn't something that usually describes groups that are typically pretty well organized. However, the article also said that propane tanks have been used by Islamic terrorists in the past...so we'll just have to wait and see.

Times Square is buried in cameras so I'd be surprised if the police don't get a good look a the perps, at the very least.

I don't know. Box cutters don't seem very professional either. I'd imagine that a properly effective car bomb would likely require military grade explosives, which would be difficult to get one's hands on here in the US, or chemical components for creating similar, difficult again since purchase and theft of these things is likely monitored. It may be that the components used for the bomb were those most easily accessible under the circumstances and required a less than ideal design and fabrication.
 
zomgwtf said:
Wow, that's crazy.

Also in one of the videos the hot dog vendor said there was an explosio from the car... how credible is that claim? I mean I've seen propane tanks go explode and there's no way that it would have left the vehicle in one piece. Not even a shattered window :/

Possibly a detonator going off? It does not seem that the bomb went off as it was supposed to. So the detonator may have gone but the bomb as a whole did not.
 
TheStatutoryApe said:
Possibly a detonator going off? It does not seem that the bomb went off as it was supposed to. So the detonator may have gone but the bomb as a whole did not.

Oh, my understanding was that the detonator was fireworks which had already gone off to no effect.
 
A crude bomb of propane, gasoline and fireworks began to detonate but did not explode on Saturday, prompting the evacuation of thousands of people.A crude bomb of propane, gasoline and fireworks began to detonate but did not explode on Saturday, prompting the evacuation of thousands of people.
NYTimes. Clearly there is an intent to cause damage and harm, or at least a depraved indifference as to the consequences of 10 gallons of gasoline and exploding propane tanks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/03/nyregion/03timessquare.html

Inside, they discovered three canisters of propane like those used for barbecue grills, two five-gallon cans of gasoline, consumer-grade fireworks — the apparent source of the “pops” — and two clocks with batteries, the mayor said. He said the device “looked amateurish.”
. . . .
 
My husband and I will be staying right off 41st and 7th in just 8 weeks. At least we know security will be tight!
 
Amateurish or not, propane blasts would be devastating, and with the mixture of gasoline and air you could have a truly nasty fireball. Given the low investment apparent in this bomb, I'm not sure that "amateurish" is such a fine statement. Unsophisticated, yes, but amateurish?... someone got a damned car bomb into Time's Square and hasn't been caught yet...
 
  • #10
TheStatutoryApe said:
I don't know. Box cutters don't seem very professional either.
Seriously? The 9/11 attack was highly organized and the terrorists were well trained. Don't let the fact that the weapon was low tech fool you: it was exactly the right tool for the job.
I'd imagine that a properly effective car bomb would likely require military grade explosives, which would be difficult to get one's hands on here in the US...
I'm not sure why you would think that. The Oklahoma city bombing was done mostly with fertilizer and nitromethane.

Using fireworks for a bomb doesn't even work against the roadrunner.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
Using fireworks for a bomb doesn't even work against the roadrunner.

I'm not sure what you meant by this statement. What I think your implying is that fireworks can not be explosive enough.

Generally I agree a few fireworks won't cause any troubles but they can ignite other explosions. As well fireworks in large amounts will definitely be devastating, you ever seen a fireworks warehouse go up?

Something that SHOULD be noted by everyone posting here is that the comment about it being amaturish wasn't in regard to the choice of explosives. It was how it was assembled. I assure you a bomb expert can tell these types of things just from seeing the device(s) even just how they are tied can lead to such an assumption. I'd assume that if this car bomb was sent by a terrorist organization that it would be far from set up in an amaturish way. It wouldn't use high-grade explosives but so what? I also doubt that it would fail, these organizations are pretty much experts in the field of assembling bombs that are effective at getting the job done.
 
  • #12
zomgwtf said:
Something that SHOULD be noted by everyone posting here is that the comment about it being amaturish wasn't in regard to the choice of explosives. It was how it was assembled. I assure you a bomb expert can tell these types of things just from seeing the device(s) even just how they are tied can lead to such an assumption. I'd assume that if this car bomb was sent by a terrorist organization that it would be far from set up in an amaturish way. It wouldn't use high-grade explosives but so what? I also doubt that it would fail, these organizations are pretty much experts in the field of assembling bombs that are effective at getting the job done.

That guy with a bomb in his pants over Christmas was sent from a terrorist organization. Same with the shoe bomber. I think you give these guys too much credit
 
  • #13
Astronuc said:
Clearly there is an intent to cause damage and harm, or at least a depraved indifference as to the consequences of 10 gallons of gasoline and exploding propane tanks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/03/nyregion/03timessquare.html
Intention is the key here! Regardless of the bomb going off or not, regardless of the knowledge of the bombmaker, it doesn't distract from the fear this causes in a sensitive place like New York City.
 
  • #14
Apparently the detonator was 16 oz aerosol can, and the fireworks seem have been intended as a means to ignite the propane after the containers ruptured. In addition, they've found 8 bags of what "feels like and appears to be" fertilizer. Given that the detonator is always the most complex and failure-prone element of a bomb, I find everything but the detonator very disturbing.
 
  • #15
zomgwtf said:
I'm not sure what you meant by this statement.
http://www.pyrodirect.com/ecom-catshow/042-0010.html

Something that SHOULD be noted by everyone posting here is that the comment about it being amaturish wasn't in regard to the choice of explosives. It was how it was assembled.
That's two parts of the same thing. You can't assemble fireworks in a professional way.
 
  • #16
Shalashaska said:
In addition, they've found 8 bags of what "feels like and appears to be" fertilizer. Given that the detonator is always the most complex and failure-prone element of a bomb, I find everything but the detonator very disturbing.
Was it just plain fertilizer - no diesel fuel mixed-in? If that's the case, it may simply be the work of some random nutcase who isn't thinking clearly enough to know what you're supposed to do with fertilizer to turn it into a bomb!
 
  • #17
russ_watters said:
http://www.pyrodirect.com/ecom-catshow/042-0010.html

That's two parts of the same thing. You can't assemble fireworks in a professional way.

Yes you can, as with any packing of black powder. I'm not saying it's hugely complicated, but there are professionals and there are hacks with full thickness burns.

As for amateurish, it seems that this individual was aware of cameras, and has used changes of clothing to make tracking him/her harder. Given that anyone here could probably assemble this kind of explosive, and far more besides, I have to conclude that this person was either sending a message, or had no concept of fuel-air mixtures required for ignition.

Amateur to me is: "I can't figure out how to detonate PETN! Durrr."
Unsophisticated is: "I'm going to get everything that can explode in one car and hightail it out of there"

This is clearly someone who, if allowed to run free, may learn from this mistake and would probably not make the same error. I find that deeply disturbing. The level of disregard for life and limb is clear when someone makes an explosive/incendiary/shrapnel bomb out of a car. If any part of this had burned and the propane's relief valves had been disabled, there would have been a very nasty shockwave, and the fireworks would likely have ignited the propane. After that, the fertalizer and gas would at least burn.

I just saw a Mythbusters episode where they (for reasons that are still unclear to me) detonated BBQ sized propane containers. Even without ignition of the propane, the blast from pressure vessel was enough to throw significant chunks of .8" steel up to 300 feet from the blast site.
 
  • #18
russ_watters said:
Was it just plain fertilizer - no diesel fuel mixed-in? If that's the case, it may simply be the work of some random nutcase who isn't thinking clearly enough to know what you're supposed to do with fertilizer to turn it into a bomb!

I don't know, but given what was being said, it sounds as though this was JUST fertilizer, and no fuel oil. As you say, that's not a bomb, that's just a load of... heh... ****. This definitely seems like someone took everything they considered explosive and stuffed it into a car. Now, whether or not that is a sign of a nutcase who is lucky he didn't blow himself straight to hell (lucky for him at least) is up for grabs.

The change of clothing (at least 2 on camera), indicates some measure of forethought. I think this is why there is a lot of speculation as to whether this is a message, or a lone wolf learning the ropes. Let's face it, if this person isn't apprehended, the latter is going to learn from this, and may not make similar mistakes. I have to say, if I were an insane *** trying to kill a bunch of people in Time's Square, it wouldn't be with fireworks, propane, gasoline and fertilizer, but how does that track with his ability to leave the area apparently aware of the surveillance?

Maybe amateurish is the right term, but... I don't know.

P.S. One purely speculative notion that's been floated was that this was aimed at Viacom, who carries South Park. If so, the "message" concept could be possible, but more likley the "nutcase who doesn't know how to make a bomb" starts to make sense. A really angry person with only fragmented knowledge and acting rapidly in response to a proximal event, thinking "even if this just burns, it'll hurt a lot of people" does seem to fit the bill. I don't know how to reconcile that with remaining unidentified however. Either way, this SCREAMS "home grown", whether Islamic or not.
 
  • #19
Shalashaska said:
Yes you can, as with any packing of black powder. I'm not saying it's hugely complicated, but there are professionals and there are hacks with full thickness burns.
Sorry, maybe I worded that badly, but I would have thought my intent was clear: What I meant was you can't assemble a pile of fireworks into a bomb in a professional way.
As for amateurish, it seems that this individual was aware of cameras, and has used changes of clothing to make tracking him/her harder.
Do you have a source for that? I didn't hear that.
I don't know, but given what was being said, it sounds as though this was JUST fertilizer, and no fuel oil. As you say, that's not a bomb, that's just a load of...
In that case then perhaps they really should be looking for Wiley Coyote.
 
  • #20
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/02/times.square.closure/index.html"

"The Pathfinder's vehicle identification number had been removed from the dashboard, but officials recovered it from another location on the car, a federal law enforcement official told CNN.

...officials have identified the registered owner of the Pathfinder, but were not yet making his name public."


Let me guess there first question, Where were you on Saturday evening?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
russ_watters said:
Sorry, maybe I worded that badly, but I would have thought my intent was clear: What I meant was you can't assemble a pile of fireworks into a bomb in a professional way. Do you have a source for that? I didn't hear that. In that case then perhaps they really should be looking for Wiley Coyote.

Ahhh, gotcha, fireworks do not make a bomb, agreed. Well, unless you're massively patient, buy a ton of them and make a pipe-bomb.

As for the source, I was watching the Chief of Police of NYC talking live on CNN. I'd imagine that is pretty widely available. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1986463,00.html

Nitpicky I know, but remember it's Wile E. Coyote. :wink: Then again, the erstwhile pup never learned from his errors... this psychotic might. Even the Unabomber made errors, but it didn't stop him from killing nad terrorizing a lot of people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #22
Borg said:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/02/times.square.closure/index.html"

"The Pathfinder's vehicle identification number had been removed from the dashboard, but officials recovered it from another location on the car, a federal law enforcement official told CNN.

...officials have identified the registered owner of the Pathfinder, but were not yet making his name public."


Let me guess there first question, Where were you on Saturday evening?

They seem to believe that the person who owns the pathfinder may not be involved. As a material witness in a potential terrorism/mass casualty event... well... of course they won't release his name.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
Ok, it's confirmed that the fertilizer was "not explosive". The gasoline and propane certainly were, but we all seem to be in agreement already that a 16 ounce can filled with commercial fireworks posed no threat. Given that, it's probably fair to assume that the emergency relief valves on the propane were NOT disabled.

A really REALLY angry Wile E. Coyote it is apparently, just one with a modicum of trade-craft. *bows to russ waters*
 
  • #24
Shalashaska said:
Ok, it's confirmed that the fertilizer was "not explosive".

How was this confirmed? Ammonium nitrate powered or peril doesn't look or feel much different whether or not the proportionally small quantity of fuel oil is mixed in or not. The powder will cake a little more, and the peril might feel slightly oily.
 
  • #25
Phrak said:
How was this confirmed? Ammonium nitrate powered or peril doesn't look or feel much different whether or not the proportionally small quantity of fuel oil is mixed in or not. The powder will cake a little more, and the peril might feel slightly oily.

NYPD/FBI joint statement that was released an hour or so ago, carried by CNN and other networks.
 
  • #26
Fantastic, an arrest has been made. I love how this country doesn't waste any time finding their persons of interest!
 
  • #27
Kerrie said:
Fantastic, an arrest has been made. I love how this country doesn't waste any time finding their persons of interest!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_times_square_car_bomb
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #28
Kerrie said:
Fantastic, an arrest has been made. I love how this country doesn't waste any time finding their persons of interest!

Wow, just barely.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/04/new.york.car.bomb/index.html"

"They just caught him at the last second," according to the source, who said Shahzad was on board the flight to Dubai and the jetway had been pulled back when the plane was called to return to the gate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
It is amazing how well they are doing their job.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 801 ·
27
Replies
801
Views
93K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
19K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
15K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K