Who really invented Liquid Paper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemisttree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Paper
AI Thread Summary
Bette Nesmith Graham is recognized for inventing Liquid Paper, originally called "Mistake Out," which she developed while working as a typist. The product was created to cover typing errors using a white, water-based paint. While she initially worked alone, she later sought assistance from various individuals, including an office supplier, a school chemistry teacher, and a friend from a paint company, to refine her formula. The chemist's contributions were significant in improving the product's effectiveness, but there is debate over whether he should be credited as a co-inventor. Graham's journey involved managing her business after hours and eventually renaming her product Liquid Paper in 1958, leading to its success and sale to Gillette for $47.5 million. The discussion highlights the complexities of invention credit and the legal implications of contributions to product development, emphasizing that while Graham is credited as the inventor, the role of others in refining the product remains a topic of contention.
  • #51
jimmysnyder said:
Just yesterday we signed the assignment document.
Things are going swimmingly. The patent has been 'allowed' by the USPTO. The next step is to pay the patent issue fee. This should take place before May 29. Then it is expected that the patent will be issued about three months after the payment. The application was made in July, 2003.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
chemisttree said:
He always had a jar of M&Ms in his office (provided gratis on a regular basis by a grateful company) that he handed out to everyone that came by. We also got free samples of clumping kitty litter from another company for 'quality control' purposes. It always seemed to clump.

Southwest Research Institute - so were you guys collegues?
 
  • #53
GCT said:
Southwest Research Institute - so were you guys collegues?

My office was right next door to him. I miss the M&M's too.
 
  • #54
That makes more sense - from the discussions so far it sounded as if you were an avant admirer rather than a close colleague. You must have learned a lot from working with such a talented scientist.

My condolences...
 
  • #55
jimmysnyder said:
Things are going swimmingly. The patent has been 'allowed' by the USPTO. The next step is to pay the patent issue fee. This should take place before May 29. Then it is expected that the patent will be issued about three months after the payment. The application was made in July, 2003.

Congratulations, Jimmy! Five years is a little long to wait but it isn't unheard of. There must have been a lot of back and forth between your lawyers and the USPTO examiner. My most recent patent atty. likes to draw out the process (and increase her billing). I wonder how long my next atty. will take...
 
  • #56
chemisttree said:
Congratulations, Jimmy! Five years is a little long to wait but it isn't unheard of. There must have been a lot of back and forth between your lawyers and the USPTO examiner. My most recent patent atty. likes to draw out the process (and increase her billing). I wonder how long my next atty. will take...
Thanks. The reason this took so long is that the main idea had already been patented in Australia. So even though our idea was original, we weren't the first to have this original idea. We made more than 120 claims, of which only a little less than 50 survived the process. A claim is like this: if you invented the teacup, you could claim it can be used for coffee too. If you don't make the claim, someone else can. And that is why we got the patent, we claimed things that they didn't.
 
  • #57
chemisttree said:
Congratulations, Jimmy! Five years is a little long to wait but it isn't unheard of. There must have been a lot of back and forth between your lawyers and the USPTO examiner. My most recent patent atty. likes to draw out the process (and increase her billing). I wonder how long my next atty. will take...

My boyfriend is a patent atty, and from all his grumbling, it's the examiners that draw things out. On the other hand, he says that if a patent goes through too easily, you know you've done something wrong...like make the claims so narrow that they offer virtually no protection at all. It's sort of like a game of the Price is Right...you want to get as close as you can to the other patents without going over.
 
  • #60
jimmysnyder said:
I would say it was 50-50 as far as the ideas that were flowing at that time. However, it was he who had the big break-through idea that is the basis of the patent.

so it was 50-50 between you three inventors? you are going to have a hard time splitting that dollar.
 
  • #61
out of whack said:
I want to see YouTube clips of this used on a raucous crowd. It should be a riot!

It was a riot! Have you ever seen a General (or was that a Colnel) slip and fall flat on his rear guard? Priceless!
A special walker was designed to hold the tethered test subject slightly off the ground when they slipped. It didn't work as hoped...
 

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
1K
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
221
Back
Top