Why are CFC-Gases Inert Despite Their High Electronegativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chem.Stud.
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of certain halogenated compounds, particularly 1,2-dichloro-3,4-difluoromethane, and the reasons behind their lack of reactivity. The stability is attributed to the strong carbon-fluorine bonds and the polar nature of the molecule, which results from the electronegativity of the halogens. The presence of multiple electronegative atoms creates a significant positive charge on the carbon, raising questions about the potential for substitution reactions and the role of halogens as leaving groups. The conversation seeks clarification on bond enthalpies, specifically for compounds like CFC-11, to better understand the underlying chemistry of these stable gases.
Chem.Stud.
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
I've been thinking about this for some time now, and I can't find anything specific on it on the interwebs.

Clearly, these gases are very stable, or else they would react. But why stable? Can it really be so beneficial for, let's say, 1,2-dichloro-3,4-difluoromethane to have so kany electronegative atoms bonded to the carbon? The molecule would be very polar with a relatively big plsitive charge on the carbon atom. I would think that one of the halogens would make a good leaving group in substitution...

I'm lost, could someone please help me out? :)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think it has to be with very strong bonds between C and the halogens. The halogens are pulling very much on the electrons, which makes the molecule very polar, and the bonds very strong.

But if someone else could confirm, and go a little more in-depth, you'd probably be better off. What's the bond enthalpies for a "normal" CFC? For CFC-11, for example?
 
Chem.Stud. said:
I've been thinking about this for some time now, and I can't find anything specific on it on the interwebs.

Clearly, these gases are very stable, or else they would react. But why stable? Can it really be so beneficial for, let's say, 1,2-dichloro-3,4-difluoromethane to have so kany electronegative atoms bonded to the carbon? The molecule would be very polar with a relatively big plsitive charge on the carbon atom. I would think that one of the halogens would make a good leaving group in substitution...

I'm lost, could someone please help me out? :)

They are characterized by strong carbon–fluorine bonds
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K