Why Are Different Distances Used in Fluid Dynamics Calculations?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 1K views
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


in the second picturre, why the zs1 and zs2 is calculated by using 2m and 0.6m respectively ? it should be 0.8m , am i right ? what's the purpose of the author to use 2m and 0.6m ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 0032.jpg
    0032.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 429
  • 0033.jpg
    0033.jpg
    92.2 KB · Views: 403
Physics news on Phys.org
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


in the second picturre, why the zs1 and zs2 is calculated by using 2m and 0.6m respectively ? it should be 0.8m , am i right ? what's the purpose of the author to use 2m and 0.6m ?
0.8m is the height of the tank. The author is comparing two orientations of the tank. In one orientation the front-to-back distance is 2m, in the other it is 0.6m. The zs values are the corresponding extra heights of the water, so one calculation uses 2m, while the other uses 0.6m.
 
haruspex said:
0.8m is the height of the tank. The author is comparing two orientations of the tank. In one orientation the front-to-back distance is 2m, in the other it is 0.6m. The zs values are the corresponding extra heights of the water, so one calculation uses 2m, while the other uses 0.6m.
why not we use 0.8m instead of 2m and 0.6m to get zs? the zs is in the same direction as 0.8m , right ?
 
haruspex said:
0.8m is the height of the tank. The author is comparing two orientations of the tank. In one orientation the front-to-back distance is 2m, in the other it is 0.6m. The zs values are the corresponding extra heights of the water, so one calculation uses 2m, while the other uses 0.6m.
can you please sketch out the 3d diagram , so that i can understand better
 
goldfish9776 said:
why not we use 0.8m instead of 2m and 0.6m to get zs? the zs is in the same direction as 0.8m , right ?
Yes, but that is only relevant to the question whether or not the water pours out of the tank: whether zs< 0.8 or zs> 0.8.
To calculate the actual increase in the height of the water on the back wall you need to use the distance from front wall to back wall. And that depends upon the orientation of the tank.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, but that is only relevant to the question whether or not the water pours out of the tank: whether zs< 0.8 or zs> 0.8.
To calculate the actual increase in the height of the water on the back wall you need to use the distance from front wall to back wall. And that depends upon the orientation of the tank.
i think i get the idea already . why the distance is distance between the front and back wall ? Isn't the dstance= distance between the right and left wall as shown in the figure 3-52 ?
 
goldfish9776 said:
i think i get the idea already . why the distance is distance between the front and back wall ? Isn't the dstance= distance between the right and left wall as shown in the figure 3-52 ?
I was using front-to-back in reference to the direction of movement. In one scenario, front-to-back is 2m (and the 0.6m doesn't matter); in the other it's the other way around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: goldfish9776