Why are disconnected diagrams dropped from S-Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter LedPhoton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams S-matrix
Click For Summary
Disconnected diagrams are typically dropped from S-matrix calculations in perturbative quantum field theory because they do not contribute to the correlation functions in a significant way. The discussion highlights that while both connected and disconnected diagrams can represent the same scattering process, the interference effects between them often cancel out when averaged over relative temporal and spatial separations. This leads to a simplification where only the connected diagrams contribute meaningfully to the S-matrix elements. The assumption that disconnected diagrams can be ignored is based on their lack of impact on the overall scattering amplitude in most scenarios. Ultimately, this practice streamlines calculations without losing essential physical information.
LedPhoton
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am talking about perturbative quantum field theory. When calculating elements of correlation functions(which then I use to calculate S-matrix elements) one always comes up with connected and disconnected diagrams. These disconnected diagrams are usually dropped from the calculation and I wonder why. Note that I am not talking about vacuum-vacuum diagrams.
I'll give an example, suppose you have real scalar field with a Phi^3 interaction AND a Phi^6 interaction. A 2Phi->4Phi particle scattering can happen in at least two ways (as calculated from a six point correlating function):
One 6-point vertex in which 2 initial particles enter and 4 final particles exit.
Two 3-point vertex. In each vertex 1 initial particle enters and 2 final particles exit.
It seems to be tacitly assumed that the second diagram may be dropped. In most cases we may understand these to be two separate processes, but there must be some cases in which the two terms contribute to the same process: there must be quantum interference between the terms.
Is there some process that kills this interference? Why is the disconnected diagram usually dropped?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not an expert on this, but I remember that the interferences drop out as you average over the relative temporal/ spatial separation of the scattering events. You finally get a simple product of the averaged S-matrix contribution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K