Why Are Feynman Diagrams Crucial for Understanding Electroweak Vertices?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jodahr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electro Weak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Feynman diagrams are essential for understanding electroweak vertices, particularly in processes involving quark interactions. The discussion highlights a specific process: up antidown → W+ → up antidown, which involves two vertices characterized by the CKM matrix and projector terms. The first vertex corresponds to a term in the Lagrangian like (u dbar W-), while the second is its Hermitian conjugate (ubar d W+). The relationship between the vertices and the CKM matrix's unitarity is crucial for accurate calculations in particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their components
  • Familiarity with the CKM matrix and its role in quark mixing
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics in quantum field theory
  • Basic concepts of particle interactions and electroweak theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the CKM matrix and its implications for quark interactions
  • Learn about the derivation and application of Feynman rules in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of Hermitian conjugates in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of gauge bosons in electroweak interactions
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum field theorists, and students studying electroweak interactions will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on quark dynamics and Feynman diagram analysis.

Jodahr
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a question about Feynman Diagrams:

let's say we have a process: up antidown -> W+ -> up antidown...

the first vertex is like V_CKM G PL ( mixing, gamma, projector)
the second is the same..only with the complex conjugate CKM matrix...
but why?...

If I compute the M* I have to bar the vertices..and there I got the same vertex..with the same flow..but there I would change PL to PR and interchange PL and Gamma..why is that the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jodahr said:
I have a question about Feynman Diagrams:

let's say we have a process: up antidown -> W+ -> up antidown...

the first vertex is like V_CKM G PL ( mixing, gamma, projector)
the second is the same..only with the complex conjugate CKM matrix...
but why?...

If I compute the M* I have to bar the vertices..and there I got the same vertex..with the same flow..but there I would change PL to PR and interchange PL and Gamma..why is that the case?

Hello, in my opinion the answer is the following: the Feynman diagram you are considering is composed of two vertices: in the first an up is destroyed, an antidown is destroyed and a W+ is created; in the second vertex an up is created, an antidown is created and a W+ is destroyed; so, roughly speaking, the first is associated with a term in the lagrangian like (u dbar W-), while the second with (ubar d W+), that is its hermitian conjugate (of course I have forgot all the contraction matrices...); this is the origin of the conjugation of the CKM matrix paramters (and, of course, one should be careful with the imaginary units!)

Francesco
 
Last edited:
I think another way of looking at it is like this.

That Feynman diagram also describes the processes

u → W+ + d
W+ + d → u​

as all I have done here is replace the incoming anti-d with an outgoing d, and the outgoing anti-d with an incoming d.

The CKM matrix, as defined, is the factor for 'converting' down-type quarks to up-type, eg

|u> = Vud |d>​

Provided only the three known generations of quarks exist, the CKM matrix must be unitary, and hence

V-1 = V

so

|d> = V*ud |u>​
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K