Why are field lines parallel in a uniform field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of electric field lines in a uniform electric field, particularly how these lines can be parallel despite being generated by multiple point sources that create radial fields. Participants explore the relationship between radial fields and the formation of parallel field lines, considering the underlying physical principles and analogies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the uniform field is created by multiple charged atoms acting as point sources, which generate radial fields that do not inherently produce parallel field lines.
  • Others suggest that the vector sum of these radial fields results in the formation of parallel field lines in the region between the plates.
  • A participant draws an analogy with wave propagation, indicating that the summation of circular waves from adjacent sources can lead to a more linear wave front, which may help explain the parallel nature of the field lines.
  • It is noted that on the edges of the plates, the field lines may bulge outward, indicating a deviation from perfect parallelism at those points.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the charges on the plates are fixed, leading to fields that are perpendicular to the surface, reinforcing the idea that the vector sum results in a uniform field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on how parallel field lines arise from radial fields, and while some analogies are shared, there is no consensus on the exact mechanism or implications of these observations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of electric fields and the nature of charge distribution on the plates, which may not be fully resolved. The analogy with wave propagation introduces additional complexity that is not universally accepted among participants.

jackiepollock
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
For a uniform field like this, I imagine the two plates that creates it are made of multiple atoms with charges, which are points sources that create radial fields. We know that radial fields don't have parallel fields lines, so how are parallel fields lines form when the field is made of various radial fields? Is it caused by the vector sums of these radial fields?

Screenshot 2021-08-03 at 20.51.09.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Yes you have the right picture in mind. There is an analogy with waves: the summation of waves propagating in circles from adjacent sources generates a more or less linear wave front ( google huijgens principle ).

So on the edges of the plates the field lines will bulge outward a little bit## \ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jackiepollock
BvU said:
Hello,

Yes you have the right picture in mind. There is an analogy with waves: the summation of waves propagating in circles from adjacent sources generates a more or less linear wave front ( google huijgens principle ).

So on the edges of the plates the field lines will bulge outward a little bit## \ ##
Thank you!
 
jackiepollock said:
For a uniform field like this, I imagine the two plates that creates it are made of multiple atoms with charges, which are points sources that create radial fields. We know that radial fields don't have parallel fields lines, so how are parallel fields lines form when the field is made of various radial fields? Is it caused by the vector sums of these radial fields?

View attachment 287041
On the plate the charges are on the surface which can’t move because the field don’t have any tangential component along the surface. The vector sum of all the fields at all points are fields perpendicular to the surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
965
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K