I Why are rotated parallel axes still parallel?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter unified
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Axes
unified
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
In relativity, angles are coordinate dependent. If this is true, then why are rotated parallel axes still parallel?
I tried posting this on the physicsstackexchange, but wasn't making any progress in understanding what's going on.
Suppose the axes in two coordinate systems S, S' are parallel. Now, suppose I rotate S through some angle ##\theta## and also rotate S' through the same angle ##\theta## It's not clear to me that the rotated axes will remain parallel. In relativity, angles are coordinate dependent. For example, if S and S' are parallel and S' moves at velocity ##\left| v \right| \hat x## relative to S, and someone in S' places a bar at an angle of ##\theta## with respect to the axis x', then this angle will not be the same as the angle relative to the x axis. If someone in S then places a bar at an angle ##\theta## with respect to x, then am I correct that this bar won't be parallel to the bar in S' since an observer in S measures the bars at different angles relative to the x axis? However, these bars are just rotated axes, both rotated at the same angle ##\theta##, but they're not parallel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unified said:
It's not clear to me that the rotated axes will remain parallel.
Is it a problem if they don't? Is there some reason why you think they should?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
unified said:
Now, suppose I rotate S through some angle ##\theta## and also rotate S' through the same angle ##\theta## It's not clear to me that the rotated axes will remain parallel.
I was just wondering who is measuring the rotation angle. Is the quoted text meant to mean that the S frame's ##x## axis makes an angle ##\theta## with its un-rotated original as measured in S, and the S' frame's ##x'## axis makes the same angle ##\theta## with its un-rotated original as measured in S'? If so, I agree with Peter, and I don't immediately see that the rotated axes would still be parallel. At least not in general - it should hold for rotations in the plane perpendicular to the frames' travel directions.
 
Yes, that's correct. My motivation for asking this question is that the popular derivation of the formula for a generalized Lorentz transformation uses a rotation of the axes in this way, and it's assumed that they remain parallel.

Let me clarify.

Suppose S and S' have axes aligned with origins coinciding at t = t' = 0, and S' moves with velocity ##\left| v \right|## at an angle of ##\theta## relative to the x axis as measured in frame S. Then, to derive the Lorentz transformation from S to S', the usual solution is to rotate the x-y axes so that as measured in S, the rotated axis ##\bar x## makes an angle of ##\theta## with respect to the x axis. Also, rotate the x'-y' axes so that as measured in S', the rotated axis ##\bar x'## makes an angle of ##\theta## with respect to the x' axis. Now, assuming ##\bar S## and ##\bar S'## have parallel axes, then since ##\bar S'## moves with velocity ##\left| v \right|## ##\hat {\bar x}##, we can use Lorentz transformation formula that applies in this case, and then transform back to the original reference frames using the inverse rotation matrices.

I can't understand why ##\bar S## and ##\bar S'## have parallel axes.
 
Last edited:
unified said:
the popular derivation of the formula for a generalized Lorentz transformation uses a rotation of the axes in this way
It does? How so? Please give a specific reference.
 
unified said:
If someone in S then places a bar at an angle ##\theta## with respect to x, then am I correct that this bar won't be parallel to the bar in S' since an observer in S measures the bars at different angles relative to the x axis?
The Lorentz Transformation just applies a scale factor to the spatial dimensions along the relative motion of the two frames. So if two physical bars are parallel in one inertial frame, they are also parallel in every inertial frame.

But if you are talking about the angle of a physical bar to a coordinate axis, that depends on how you defined the frame axes, and can change even for Galilean Transformations.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top