I Why are Saturn's rings in its equatorial plane?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter KurtLudwig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Rings
AI Thread Summary
Saturn's rings are primarily located in its equatorial plane due to gravitational effects related to the planet's rotation and tidal forces. The discussion highlights that as Saturn spins, it bulges at the equator, which enhances gravitational pull in that region, causing orbiting particles to align with the equatorial plane. This phenomenon is supported by basic orbital mechanics, where non-equatorial orbits experience oscillating gravitational forces that drive them towards the equatorial plane. Various hypotheses about the formation and maintenance of the rings are explored in a detailed paper, emphasizing the complexity of planetary astronomy. The consensus on the exact mechanisms remains elusive, with ongoing research contributing to the understanding of Saturn's ring system.
KurtLudwig
Gold Member
Messages
146
Reaction score
31
TL;DR Summary
What mechanism pulled small ice and stone particles preferentially into orbiting in the equatorial plane of Saturn? Is there a resonance involved? Wikipedia says that there is no consensus. What are some hypotheses?
What mechanism pulled small ice and stone particles preferentially into orbiting in the equatorial plane of Saturn? Is there a resonance involved? Wikipedia says that there is no consensus. What are some hypotheses?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This article cover some theories about the formation of rings https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3017

What mechanism that pulled objects in, gravity? Why in the equatorial plane? Isn't that just due to spinning objects tend to bulge out at the equator, which makes gravity stronger there so that every orbiting object will eventually end up orbiting that object around the equatorial plane due to tidal effects? This should be a well known and established theory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, that alignment should follow from basic orbital mechanics. With a bulge and a non-equatorial orbit there is an oscillating gravitational force component perpendicular to the orbital plane that acts to change the orbital inclination towards the plane of the bulge.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes KurtLudwig, timmdeeg and malawi_glenn
drmalawi said:
This article cover some theories about the formation of rings https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3017

What mechanism that pulled objects in, gravity? Why in the equatorial plane? Isn't that just due to spinning objects tend to bulge out at the equator, which makes gravity stronger there so that every orbiting object will eventually end up orbiting that object around the equatorial plane due to tidal effects? This should be a well known and established theory.
This article cover some theories about the formation of rings https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3017
This very detailed paper, of 76 pages, discusses different mechanisms for the creation and maintenance of Saturn's many rings. It is amazing how complex planetary astronomy can be. Thanks for referring me to this paper.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes timmdeeg and malawi_glenn

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Venus and Jupiter Conjunction'

Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Are orbital resonances constructive or destructive?
Replies
1
Views
988
I Comet A117uUD Goes Interstellar after Encountering Saturn in 2022
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Is there some prediction of the speed of rings?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B We have kittens in orbit around Saturn
Replies
3
Views
2K
Iapetus equatorial ridge fell from the skies
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Why are Saturn's moons so bright?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Composition of Jupiter: Ices, Cores & Outer Gas Layers
Replies
24
Views
4K
I Particle distribution as a function of radius in astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Are Saturn's Rings Caused by Fractal Structures?
Replies
3
Views
2K
A What keeps Rhea stable? Simulation shows Titan-assist escape
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top