Are orbital resonances constructive or destructive?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter smithpa9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
smithpa9
Messages
40
Reaction score
23
If I understand correctly, orbital resonances of some of Saturn's moons are responsible for clearing out gaps in Saturn's ring structure (like the Cassini division). But I've also read that Neptune and Pluto are in a roughly 2:3 orbital resonance. So, do orbital resonances pull matter out of a stable orbit (thus creating ring gaps on Saturn)? Or do they lock objects into a stable pattern (Neptune/Pluto)? Or do they really do both? And if both, how can you explain that seeming contradiction? Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is no contradiction. In order for some orbits to be relatively stable, others must be relatively unstable (otherwise all orbits would be equally stable). Over time, bodies move from relatively unstable trajectories to relatively stable ones.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda and smithpa9