Why Are The Units of Coulombs Law What They Are?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the units in Coulomb's Law, specifically why force is expressed in Newtons (N) and how the units of the permittivity constant are derived. The units of the permittivity constant are (C^2)/(N-M^2), which ensures that the equation maintains dimensional consistency. The charges Q1 and Q2, measured in coulombs, do not appear in the final units because their product is counterbalanced by Coulomb's constant, which includes a coulomb-squared term. Ultimately, the relationship defined by Coulomb's Law allows the force to be expressed in Newtons, as the units of the constant K adjust accordingly. Understanding these unit relationships clarifies the application of Coulomb's Law in physics.
PurelyPhysical
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Why are the units of force used when applying coulombs law (N-M^2)/(C^2)? This is actually a three part question.

1. Why are the units of the permitivity constant (C^2)/(N-M^2)?
2. Why do Q1 and Q2 not contribute to the final units? Each charge is measured in coulombs, but those units don't reflect in the final units.
3. Units of force are Newtons. Why then can we say that coulombs law equals force? What's going on with the other units that makes it so that we can still refer to it as a force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1 times Q2 is canceled out by Coulomb's constant (which contains a coulomb-2 term).
 
David Lewis said:
Q1 times Q2 is canceled out by Coulomb's constant (which contains a coulomb-2 term).
Thank you. That makes a lot of sense.
 
PurelyPhysical said:
Why are the units of force used when applying coulombs law (N-M^2)/(C^2)? This is actually a three part question.
3. Units of force are Newtons. Why then can we say that coulombs law equals force? What's going on with the other units that makes it so that we can still refer to it as a force?

There is nothing mysterious with the units that makes the final result to be expressed in units of force.
In physics the first thing are the physical laws. The relationship between the units (and the units of possible constants that are used, like the coulomb constant K) are worked out after we discover the physical laws.

In our case the physical law that Coulomb discover is that the force between two charges is proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance. In order to complete the equality we need a constant K so we can write down
##F=K\frac{Q_1Q_2}{r^2}## (1)
Now that we know this law holds, we can figure out the units of the constant K and the relationship between the units. So it will be because (1) holds

Newton=(units of constant K)*Coulomb*Coulomb/Meter^2. (2)

so the units of constant K have to be Newton*Meter^2/Coulomb^2 cause only if it is so then (2) holds.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Delta[2]

Do you mean F = [m1m2]/r^2?

Oh! What a popular equation! Newton, coulomb, La Place is there more?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top