1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why aren't these lattices isomorphic?

  1. Dec 20, 2006 #1
    Hi,

    I can't see why these lattices aren't isomorphic:

    [tex]
    (\mathbb{N} \mbox{ u } \left\{-\infty, +\infty\right\}, \le) \mbox{ and } (\mathbb{N} \mbox{ u } \left\{-\infty, +\infty\right\}, \le)^{inverse}
    [/itex]

    I thought that this isomorphism would straightforwardly map an element x onto -x in the second lattice, so why aren't these isomorphic please?

    I see why these two lattices aren't isomorphic:

    [tex]
    (\mathbb{N}, \le) \mbox{ and } (\mathbb{N}, \le)^{inverse}
    [/itex]

    because the element 0 from the first one has no equivalent in the inversed lattice, but the first couple of lattices seems ok to me.




    Thank you for clarification.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 20, 2006 #2

    StatusX

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    N consists only of positive integers. If you meant Z, all integers, the first pair are isomorphic.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Why aren't these lattices isomorphic?
  1. Lattice of subgroups (Replies: 6)

  2. Algebra: lattices (Replies: 3)

  3. An Isomorphism (Replies: 3)

  4. Plane Lattices (Replies: 0)

Loading...