Why can light travel at the speed c?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mibaokula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Speed Travel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why light, specifically photons, can travel at the speed of light (c) while massive particles cannot. Participants explore the implications of special relativity equations, particularly regarding energy and mass, and whether these equations apply to massless particles like photons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the equation E = mc^2/(1-(v^2/c^2)) and its implications for massive particles, noting that it suggests infinite energy is required to accelerate a massive particle to the speed of light.
  • Others propose that the more general equation E^2 = mc^4 + p^2c^2 should be used for all particles, including massless photons, to avoid confusion.
  • There is a debate about the nature of dividing by zero, with some arguing that a large number divided by zero is infinite, while others assert that dividing zero by zero is indeterminate and can yield various values.
  • Some participants express confusion over the distinction between undefined and indeterminate forms, particularly in the context of energy calculations for massless particles.
  • A later reply suggests that when considering photons, one can take the limit of mass approaching zero independently of the speed approaching c, leading to different interpretations of energy calculations.
  • One participant shares a derivation that avoids division by zero and proposes a different approach to understanding the energy of massless particles.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of defining 1/0 as infinite and how this affects mathematical consistency and definitions of infinity.
  • Another participant clarifies that the original question about undefined energy for photons is based on a misunderstanding, as the equation does not yield undefined energy for light in the same way it does for massive particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretations of energy equations for massless particles versus massive particles. There are multiple competing views regarding the implications of dividing by zero and the applicability of certain equations to photons.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the relationship between mass, energy, and speed of light, particularly regarding the definitions and implications of mathematical forms like undefined and indeterminate. Some assumptions about the applicability of equations to massless particles remain unresolved.

  • #31
mibaokula said:
i just realized i misunderstood your point. i think we meant the same thing. 0/0 is indeterminate because it has an infinite number of answers - i.e. any real number. what i meant to say is that it is not enough to say the answer is 1, 0, or infinity
If you just ask the question, what is 0/0, there are an infinite number of answers, but that doesn't mean that your equation for the energy of a massless particle has an infinite number of answers, it just means that you need to determine the answer some other way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
in other words, that equation doesn't fully describe light (which has no mass)
but would it describe tachyons with negative/imaginary mass (assuming they exist - which i really don't believe at the moment)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
612
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K