Why can light travel at the speed c?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mibaokula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Speed Travel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of Einstein's equations in special relativity, particularly regarding the speed of light and massless particles like photons. The equation E = mc²/(1 - (v²/c²)) indicates that as an object's speed approaches the speed of light, its energy becomes undefined due to division by zero. However, the more general equation E² = mc⁴ + p²c² applies to all particles, including massless photons, where p represents momentum. Participants clarify that while massive particles require infinite energy to reach the speed of light, photons do not possess undefined energy but rather an indeterminate form when analyzed through this equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's special relativity
  • Familiarity with the equations E = mc² and E² = mc⁴ + p²c²
  • Basic knowledge of momentum in physics
  • Concept of indeterminate forms in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of E² = mc⁴ + p²c² for massless particles
  • Explore the concept of indeterminate forms in calculus
  • Learn about the relationship between mass, energy, and momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of tachyons and their theoretical implications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of special relativity and the nature of light and massless particles.

  • #31
mibaokula said:
i just realized i misunderstood your point. i think we meant the same thing. 0/0 is indeterminate because it has an infinite number of answers - i.e. any real number. what i meant to say is that it is not enough to say the answer is 1, 0, or infinity
If you just ask the question, what is 0/0, there are an infinite number of answers, but that doesn't mean that your equation for the energy of a massless particle has an infinite number of answers, it just means that you need to determine the answer some other way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
in other words, that equation doesn't fully describe light (which has no mass)
but would it describe tachyons with negative/imaginary mass (assuming they exist - which i really don't believe at the moment)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
692
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K