MHB Why Can't Two Functions Cover the Unit Circle?

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading the book: "Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential Forms" (Fourth Edition) by John H Hubbard and Barbara Burke Hubbard.

I am currently focused on Section 3.1: Manifolds ...

I need some help in order to understand Example 3.1.3 ... ...

Example 3.1.3 reads as follows:View attachment 8633In the above text from H&H we read the following:

"Here we need the graphs of four functions to cover the entire circle ... "My question is as follows:

Why can we not cover the unit circle with the following two functions:

$$y = \sqrt{ 1 - x^2 }$$ where $$-1 \le x \le 1$$

and

$$y = - \sqrt{ 1 - x^2 }$$ where $$-1 \lt x \lt 1$$

I must be misunderstanding something ...

Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • H&H - Example 3.1.5 ... .png
    H&H - Example 3.1.5 ... .png
    12.3 KB · Views: 119
Physics news on Phys.org
In the context of the Hubbards' book, one wants to cover a manifold (the circle, in this example) with open patches. So each point of the manifold must lie in the interior of one of the patches. The easiest way to do that in this case is to use four patches.
 
Opalg said:
In the context of the Hubbards' book, one wants to cover a manifold (the circle, in this example) with open patches. So each point of the manifold must lie in the interior of one of the patches. The easiest way to do that in this case is to use four patches.
Thanks Opalg ...

That makes the issue clear ... grateful for that!

Peter
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top