cyrusabdollahi said:
Its because they go on the news and say they are going to kill people and burn down companies that have anything to do with harming animals. COO--COO--COOO--COOO. Sorry spacetiger, but there crackpots, and there's no two ways around it.
Could you provide a source to support this assertion please.
cyrusabdollahi said:
Yep, that is justice. He had a court hearing. He was found guilty of killing a family, he showed no remorse, and so he was punished to death. That is what's called justice, as opposed to what you want, which is revenge. And what I brought up is exactly PETA's philosophy and is on topic.
No that is vengeance. Justice would be to make those harmed whole again which is impossible in the case of murder.
And again I challenge you to provide evidence that your assertion is PETA's philosophy.
cyrusabdollahi said:
NOPE! Its no eating animals or your a MURDERER! like i said, crackpots.
To kill a creature that loves life as much as you, simply to satisfy your own gluttony
is immoral, there is no two ways around it.
Bladibla said:
MORE animals will die due to people taking on a vegan diet, and yet you say the animal right activist will choose a vegan diet EVEN as they know they are killing more animals?
Since most grain is fed to animals raised for human consumption, your statement is erroneous.
Livingod said:
I am against animal suffering as well, but we as human beings need meat to live. If babies grow up the PeTA way, we'll be looking at a higher infant morality rate. The USDA did not make the food pyramid just for show.
I would suggest you read the most extensive human nutritional study ever conducted, "The China Study". Humans do not need to eat meat, in fact eating meat is responsible for the majority of disease in humans, especially the affluent. Cancer, diabetes, and heart disease are all diseases of affluence.
cyrusabdollahi said:
Who cares, it tastes good. I'd shoot a cow in the head and eat it, without hesistation. Painless death, and good food! Yummy. Yeah the cow will die, so sad... Hes not a pet cow. I don't really care if he's dead to be honest. I just care that he tastes good, and his skin makes good leather.
Would you eat a dead baby? It would taste really good. Why bury your grandparents when they die? Just grind them up and make sausages, that you can eat on special occasions to remember them by.
TheStatutoryApe said:
I think that this whole moral issue arises merely from a sense of familiarity with living things that are more similar to us than others. Plants are just as much living "breathing" life forms as any other. I don't see why they are ok to eat and other living things aren't. Plants have no more "desire" to be eaten than anything else does and have evolved means of protecting themselves from being "killed" just like every other life form.
So what is the morality behind eating only plants? They aren't like us and they can't run away so it's better?
We can eat plants without killing them. In fact the Jains do not eat roots for this very reason.
Plants depend on animals to eat them and fertilize the soil with there scats, spread their seeds, and exhale CO2 for them to breath. There is a beautiful symbiotic relationship between plants and animals.
Natural carnivores regulate the herbivores.
Most animals can survive on either plant or animal foods, humans are optimized to eat plants. When we eat animals it costs us our health.
cyrusabdollahi said:
Are you saying eaitng meat is immoral?
yes
cyrusabdollahi said:
Eating meat is moral Ape. Didn't Jesus make meat (Fish) for his people? I guess he thinks Jesus is immoral too...
How do you know?
It is a story about a miracle with no evidence to support the story.
His brother James ate no meat, nor drank no wine. If his brother was vegetarian, would it not be a logical assumption that Jesus was also?
"Blessed are the meek"
Slaughtering a living creature is not meek.