Why Did Reddit Trigger a GameStop Stock Surge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wall
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
816 replies · 50K views
russ_watters
Mentor
Insights Author
Messages
23,899
Reaction score
11,352
Two weeks ago Gamestop was worth $20 a share. Today it's worth $350. As I just heard on CNBC: for the same money, you could by Gamestop or you could buy Delta. Why is this happening? Because a reddit sub saw that Wall Street was bearish on Gamestop and got annoyed. So in order to Stick it to the Man, they started buying. And buying. And buying. And it worked! Cost hedge funds billions, earned assumed to be real redditors millions (on paper). Meanwhile, Gamestop is still dying, though it feels better about it.

I predict that next week there will be a run on Kleenex.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/27/investing/gamestop-reddit-stock/index.html
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Evo, Jarvis323 and 2 others
on Phys.org
It's pretty cool that they pulled this off. It's too bad that Wall Street fat cats have the power to sway regulators to step in and protect them when their bets go wrong.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835, chemisttree, rsk and 1 other person
Short it using CFD's if you are that way inclined. During my days of share trading I saw all sorts of similar stuff. That's why I gave away short term trading - first I was not that good at it and secondly long term trading based on buying when below a line of linear regression and selling when above worked well (ie relying on regression to the mean) and was much easier on the nerves. Or you can simply switch between classes depending on how far above or below you were - above go for high yield defensive bonds - below - high growth although I found a small cap index fund was a bit better - strange. Medium term trading was OK but it still required you to watch your positions like a hawk. You could do long term trading on the weekend. ETF's have really changed things from when I did it.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
s-jokes9.jpg?fit=scale&fm=pjpg&h=335&ixlib=php-3.3.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rsk, Locrian, OmCheeto and 1 other person
Greg Bernhardt said:
Robinhood just stopped orders for GME and AMC. Such a rigged system. That platform is now dead.
i use robinhood for buying doge coin and ill admit its a little dead
 
Maybe disregard my tweet pastes above...The wallstreetbets Reddit has many people saying they are buying all over the world. Even though Robinhood has paused trading on those targeted stocks, non-U.S. investors can buy (people are reporting in from Canada, Singapore, Australia, India, etc.).

That seems to debunk the "evidence" listed above.

Very crazy stuff! The whole world is watching and getting involved.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rsk
its fun to watch the little guy win
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rsk
fresh_42 said:
Can we call this outsider trading in contrast to the usual insider trading of the established trading places?
i think it is outsider trading, don't take my word for it though.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I wouldn't call it an attack.
My understanding is part of the motivation of the redditors is to harm the hedge funds(which they did). I think it's fair to call that an attack. I'm not sure what else to call it. Competition? Maybe, but in managing my portfolio, what good/harm I'm doing to other investors never enters my head.
Hedge funds use the same tactics to game the system and no one bats an eyelash.
These reddit users batted an eyelash. I think it's fair to say that if hedge fund managers knowingly take actions that will depress a stock (while they profit from it), that's an attack too. So, the way I see this; the hedge fund managers attacked Gamestop. Reddit saw that and didn't like it, so they counter-attacked on Gamestop's behalf (successfully).

What I'm not sure the redditors have thought through is their own endgame and risk.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EHope
fresh_42 said:
Can we call this outsider trading in contrast to the usual insider trading of the established trading places?
I'd call it a pump and dump if an investment firm did it. It would be illegal. Not illegal for outsiders as far as I know, but still wrong if some make a ton of money while others lose a ton.
 
russ_watters said:
I'd call it a pump and dump if an investment firm did it. It would be illegal. Not illegal for outsiders as far as I know, but still wrong if some make a ton of money while others lose a ton.
I find it hilarious that one of the stocks was tootsie rolls going up by 14 dollars in 5 days
 
russ_watters said:
It would be illegal.
Yes, as is speeding. Me, too, once signed these forms where I had to promise not to do it, before they let me have a look on how it is done. And it is done. It's only a matter how it is disguised as.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto, Klystron, bhobba and 1 other person
fresh_42 said:
Yes, as is speeding. Me, too, once signed these forms where I had to promise not to do it, before they let me have a look on how it is done. And it is done. It's only a matter how it is disguised as.
What? You're defending investment companies that defraud their investors? Am I misunderstanding you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vanadium 50 said:
It certainly is. 15 USC 77. Penalty up to 5 years in prison.
wow that's harsh
 
Vanadium 50 said:
It certainly is. 15 USC 77. Penalty up to 5 years in prison.
Doesn't the first exception say it doesn't apply to individual investors? It's kind of a double-negative, so I'm unclear.
 
russ_watters said:
What? You're defending investment companies that defraud their investors? Am I misunderstanding you?
I am not defending it. I only claim that it is happening. Analysts regularly visit companies ahead of balance reports, and at other times. Their job is to gather information. Maybe it will also be available in the NYT, WJ or FT, but personal contacts work different from press conferences, so I won't bet on it.

11a.m. Broker xxx has a long phone call with fund manger yyy about buying 100,000 stocks of zzz at the price of ppp. An hour later he is somewhere outside to have lunch. And guess who else has lunch at the same time in the financial districts of the world. And this is only one opportunity to talk about the weather.

The only question is where to draw the line. If you call a market that rocks up because of simultaneous, global orders already an attack, then you have to forbid automatic stop-loss orders and computer trading.

Edit: quod licet iovi non licet bovi
 
fresh_42 said:
I am not defending it. I only claim that it is happening. Analysts regularly visit companies ahead of balance reports...
You're talking about insider trading. I'm talking about a pump-and-dump. Totally different things. I agree that the line for insider trading is blurry. The line for a pump-and-dump may be blurry too.
 
i wonder how this will affect the companys ?
 

Similar threads

News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
  • SOS2008
  • · Replies 65 ·
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
65
Views
13K