Why different objects behave differently with light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MalayInd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
Different objects interact with light based on their surface properties and material composition. Mirrors reflect light smoothly, preserving the angle of incidence, while walls diffuse light due to their rough surfaces, leading to less clear reflections. The behavior of materials with light—whether they reflect, absorb, or transmit—depends on factors like electrical conductivity and crystal structure. At the microscopic level, the interaction of light with electrons in materials can be likened to a mass on a spring, affecting how light is transmitted or absorbed. Understanding these principles can be further explored through topics like photonics.
MalayInd
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
We can see our image in a mirror but not in a wall. The explanation is that mirror reflects the light falling on it whereas the wall does not. But if the wall does not reflect light, how can we see the wall?
Another question, an object reflects some part of light, refracts other and absorbs some part.Why this happens and how does it depends on the nature of matter?
Why different objects behave diifferently with light?How can the behaviour be explained?

Keep Smiling
Malay
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wall reflects some of the light (not as much as the mirror), but also diffuses it... the light doesn't necessarily reflect with the same angle of incidence (the wall is not as "smooth" as the mirror).

An object reflects, absorbs and transmits light. This depends on many many factors. Including whether the material conducts electricity, the crystal structure etc.
A basic way to think about it can be to assume that electrons act like a mass on a spring. The electric field of the light wave oscillates these and depending on the material the electrons are damped more or less - transmitting the field or not...

That's a basic way to look at it, if you want to know more, google photonics.
 
MalayInd said:
We can see our image in a mirror but not in a wall. The explanation is that mirror reflects the light falling on it whereas the wall does not. But if the wall does not reflect light, how can we see the wall?
Another question, an object reflects some part of light, refracts other and absorbs some part.Why this happens and how does it depends on the nature of matter?
Why different objects behave diifferently with light?How can the behaviour be explained?
Both the wall and the mirror reflect light. But there is an important difference between the way a mirror reflects light and a wall reflects light.

At microscopic dimensions, the wall is rough whereas the mirror is smooth (the bumps being smaller than the wavelength of the light). So the light from the wall disperses on reflection but the reflected light from the mirror has the same characteristics at the incident light. Ever wonder why you polish shoes by rubbing really hard to get a nice shiny reflection?

AM
 
tyco05 said:
The wall reflects some of the light (not as much as the mirror), but also diffuses it... the light doesn't necessarily reflect with the same angle of incidence (the wall is not as "smooth" as the mirror).

An object reflects, absorbs and transmits light. This depends on many many factors. Including whether the material conducts electricity, the crystal structure etc.
A basic way to think about it can be to assume that electrons act like a mass on a spring. The electric field of the light wave oscillates these and depending on the material the electrons are damped more or less - transmitting the field or not...

That's a basic way to look at it, if you want to know more, google photonics.
Ok I understand the basic idea.
You are talking about the elctrons in the matter. Right?(If yes, I understood it).
Now one question about light wave:
Light is an electromagnetic wave whick can travel in vacuunm. What are sources of oscillating fields in vacuum?
Now I have wondered on the following question for a long time.We know that waves carry energy from one place to another and we are living in a sea of waves,some of them we use and others remain useless.(e.g radio waves are used only when radio is on, at all the other times energy is wasted)Is there any way to extract energy out of waves?

Keep Smiling
Malay
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top