Why diode with larger band gap has larger onset potential?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the band gap of a semiconductor and the onset voltage in a p-n junction diode. Participants explore conceptual understandings of why a larger band gap correlates with a higher onset potential, examining the roles of charge carriers, doping, and energy barriers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the conceptual basis for the increase in onset voltage with band gap, noting that while they understand the equations, they struggle with the underlying concepts.
  • Another participant suggests that the band gap energy of the semiconductor affects its conductivity, implying a connection to the onset voltage.
  • A participant questions whether the onset voltage is related to the formation of the conduction band and expresses uncertainty about the role of doping in this context.
  • One participant asserts that charge carriers introduced through doping do not need to overcome the band gap energy to flow, which they believe is a misunderstanding in the discussion.
  • Another participant explains that if the potential to move charge carriers were zero, current would flow freely, but the band gap creates a barrier that halts this flow, linking the barrier height to the band gap energy.
  • A later reply emphasizes that work is done when charge is pushed across a forward-biased junction, relating this to the concept of voltage and energy per unit charge.
  • One participant points out that when current flows, new electrons must be raised to the other potential, which requires work, indicating that this may be a source of confusion for others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the relationship between band gap and onset voltage. There is no consensus on the conceptual explanations, and multiple competing views remain regarding the mechanisms involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the roles of doping, charge carriers, and energy barriers, but there are unresolved assumptions about how these factors interact with the band gap and onset voltage. Some statements may depend on specific definitions or interpretations of semiconductor behavior.

prox777
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
I'm confused why onset voltage increases with band gap, conceptually.
I don't understand why voltage increases with band gap. I understand why from the equations, but not conceptually. From my understanding, the onset voltage is what is needed to overcome the contact potential that forms when the p-type and n-type samples are joined together in a p-n junction. But the contact potential doesn't seem to be affected by the band gap, only how easy it is for electron carriers to move from the p side to n side, and for holes to move the other way. So I don't see why band gap should influence onset voltage, and I'd like some insight/clarification for what I'm missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you might be looking for is that the semiconductor material in it has a band gap energy. Different semiconductors have higher or lower band gap energies which effect their conductivity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost
osilmag said:
I think what you might be looking for is that the semiconductor material in it has a band gap energy. Different semiconductors have higher or lower band gap energies which effect their conductivity.
Hi, thanks for your response! I'm still a bit confused, though. I might be misunderstanding something; I thought current flows through the diode in forward bias when the electrons on the n-side flow to the p-side (and vice versa for holes). Since these are carriers introduced through doping, they don't need to jump the band gap energy to start flowing. They only need to move from their localized level into the conduction band, then jump the contact potential. That's my understanding, and I'm unsure why it's incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: osilmag
You're welcome. Is the onset voltage the voltage required to form the conduction band (i.e. close the gap)? It's been awhile since I've studied semiconductors specifically.
 
prox777 said:
TL;DR Summary: I'm confused why onset voltage increases with band gap, conceptually.

I understand why from the equations, but not conceptually

prox777 said:
Since these are carriers introduced through doping, they don't need to jump the band gap energy to start flowing.
It's been a long time for me but iirc, it is the dopants that cause the band gap. There is no band gap across an arbitrary division in the intrinsic semiconductor.

Potential Difference is the same as the energy needed to cross the band gap.The presence of the dopants means that there is not much energy (volts) required for the current to flow through the bulk of the doped semiconductor (low resistance) so the voltage drop is all across the junction.

The equations that you feel that you understand, are derived using the presence of the dopant atoms. So what do you find confusing?
 
If the potential needed to move charge carriers across the junction were zero, particles would continue to just fall into holes all day long each releasing one band gap worth of energy in its fall. This source of free power is halted because the charge flow forms a charge barrier at the gap which is just high enough to halt current flow. The height of the barrier that does this is just the band gap.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Paul Colby said:
If the potential needed to move charge carriers across the junction were zero, particles would continue to just fall into holes all day long each releasing one band gap worth of energy in its fall. This source of free power is halted because the charge flow forms a charge barrier at the gap which is just high enough to halt current flow. The height of the barrier that does this is just the band gap.
This process only occurs once, of course, and that is when the junction is formed. Work is done when the band gap is formed - just as in chemical reactions.
Pushing charge across a forward biased junction also involves doing work per unit charge (the band gap). This, by definition, is the Voltage. Each coulomb passed takes about 0.7J of energy. There’s the 0.7V drop, almost whatever current is passing, so you can't assign an (Ohms style) resistance.
 
Last edited:
prox777 said:
Since these are carriers introduced through doping, they don't need to jump the band gap energy to start flowing.
I just spotted this: Could this be your problem? When current flows, new electrons enter from one side and need to be 'raised' to the other potential. This requires WORK; it's not free.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K