Why do attractive force have a negative sign? like F= -GMm/r^2

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mutineer123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Negative Sign
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the negative sign in the gravitational force formula F = -GMm/r^2, exploring the reasons behind this notation and its implications in the context of attractive forces. Participants also delve into related concepts such as centripetal force and the dynamics of orbits, making it a blend of conceptual and technical exploration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why attractive forces are represented with a negative sign, suggesting it relates to the direction of movement toward each other.
  • Others argue that the negative sign is a result of vector representation, where the direction of the force vector points toward the object being attracted.
  • A participant notes that the formula on Wikipedia does not include a negative sign, prompting further discussion on conventions.
  • Some participants explain that centripetal force is necessary for maintaining circular orbits and that gravitational force can provide this centripetal force under certain conditions.
  • There is a suggestion that the negative sign reflects the effect of reducing distance between two objects, indicating a negative impact on separation.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of differences between gravitational and centripetal forces on an object's orbit, with some suggesting it may lead to elliptical orbits.
  • One participant mentions that the negative sign may be specific to certain educational boards, indicating variability in conventions used in different curricula.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the negative sign in the gravitational force formula, with no consensus reached on its definitive meaning or necessity. Multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between gravitational and centripetal forces and their effects on orbital dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Discussion includes references to vector representation and sign conventions that may depend on specific educational contexts, indicating potential limitations in understanding the broader implications of the negative sign in gravitational force.

mutineer123
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Why do attractive force have a negative sign? The book says its because one must be moving toward the other. But how does it make it negative? I don't understand. Can anyone explain the law of gravitation formula?? F= -GMm/r^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It shouldn't. Except when dealing with vectors. Where does it say there should be a negative?

The reason there is a negative with vectors is that you can imagine that the vector is a arrow pointing in the direction of the object being attracted to you, so because it is being attracted to you the arrow shouldn't be pointing away from the direction its being pulled, it should be pointing towards the direction it is being pulled, hence the negative.
 
kk got it thanks. Hey can I ask you guys another question? What exactly is the difference between centripetal force and gravitational force?? Are they the same? WHY IS acceleration (of free fall) the (resultant) force of the difference between gravitational and centripetal force??
 
Last edited:
Hi mutineer123! :smile:

Centripetal force is the force required to keep an object in its (typically circular) orbit.
Only if the gravitational force matches the required centripetal force, will an object actually be in the corresponding orbit.

Normally, acceleration is an absolute.
It says how much an object accelerates with respect to a so called inertial frame.

However, if we're looking at the orbit of a planet, we can talk about the acceleration with respect to the orbit of this planet.
In that case the required centripetal force that will keep the planet in its orbit will match the gravitational force on the planet.

If we look at an object nearby the planet, it will also respond to the gravitational force, keeping it in the same orbit as the planet.
Any difference is an acceleration of the object with respect to the planet.
 
Centripetal force is our way of describing a theoretical force that moves an object in a circular path. In reality, this force can be provided any force. For the satellite its the gravitational force; for a coin at rest on a rough circular rotating disc, its the frictional force; for a stone, tied to a string, that is whirled around in a circle, its the tension in the string.
 
The negative sign is the result of a sign convention. The force is a vector quantity, so the sign depends on the implied direction. In polar coordinates, "r" points outward from the origin. So if the direction is not explicitly stated, it is usually taken to be positive = out.
 
mutineer123 said:
Why do attractive force have a negative sign? The book says its because one must be moving toward the other. But how does it make it negative? I don't understand. Can anyone explain the law of gravitation formula?? F= -GMm/r^2
Attractive forces tend to reduce the distance between the two objects, so reducing distance is given a negative sign.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi mutineer123! :smile:

Centripetal force is the force required to keep an object in its (typically circular) orbit.
Only if the gravitational force matches the required centripetal force, will an object actually be in the corresponding orbit.

Normally, acceleration is an absolute.
It says how much an object accelerates with respect to a so called inertial frame.

However, if we're looking at the orbit of a planet, we can talk about the acceleration with respect to the orbit of this planet.
In that case the required centripetal force that will keep the planet in its orbit will match the gravitational force on the planet.

If we look at an object nearby the planet, it will also respond to the gravitational force, keeping it in the same orbit as the planet.
Any difference is an acceleration of the object with respect to the planet.

So if there is any difference will the object stay in the orbit or fall down?
 
  • #10
mutineer123 said:
So if there is any difference will the object stay in the orbit or fall down?
It might also go into a non circular (elliptical) orbit.
 
  • #11
mutineer123 said:
Why do attractive force have a negative sign? The book says its because one must be moving toward the other. But how does it make it negative? I don't understand. Can anyone explain the law of gravitation formula?? F= -GMm/r^2

It's probably easiest to think in terms of what effect the attractive force can have on separation. It will reduce the separation if it's allowed to (not sufficient other forces to cancel it out) - so the effect is negative on the separation.
 
  • #12
mutineer123 said:
So if there is any difference will the object stay in the orbit or fall down?

If the gravitational force is greater than the required centripetal force for a (circular) orbit, then the object will follow a different orbit.
Typically this would be an elliptical orbit.

Seen from a planet, it will look like the object is falling down.
 
  • #13
Back to the original question.mutineer,am I right in assuming that you're following the AQA A2 course?If so the minus sign is a convention used by AQA.I don't think it's used by the other boards.
 
  • #14
I like Serena said:
Typically this would be an elliptical orbit.

Seen from a planet, it will look like the object is falling down.
...
And then going back up again... And so on .. .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K