Why Do B_x and C_x Have Different Signs in a Truss Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fbd
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differing signs of the x-reactions B_x and C_x in a truss analysis. Specifically, B_x is found to be positive (13 kN) while C_x is negative (-13 kN), indicating that B is under tension and C is in compression. This discrepancy arises from the moments created by loads P1 and P2, which pivot about points B and C, leading to opposite directional reactions. The analysis emphasizes the importance of correctly assuming force directions and calculating moments to avoid confusion in structural engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of truss analysis principles
  • Familiarity with equilibrium equations in structural mechanics
  • Knowledge of tension and compression forces in structures
  • Ability to calculate moments about points in a truss
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of joints in truss analysis
  • Learn about calculating moments in static equilibrium
  • Explore the differences between tension and compression in structural elements
  • Review examples of truss analysis using software tools like SAP2000 or RISA
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in truss design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
So I have this problem and I can't move on until i got this assumption cleared up. Looking at this truss
Picture1.png


If we look at the entire truss' FBD we have reactions in the x,y directions at
B and a reaction in the x direction at C.

Now I know by inspection that C_x and B_x are in the same direction (in the negative x direction). But, for the sake of consistency I will assume that all forces are in the POSITIVE direction. After solving my equations of equilibrium, I know that a negative sign will mean that the assumed direction was incorrect.

I solved for C_x directly by taking the moments about B.
\sum M_B=0\Rightarrow 1(10)+2(8)+2(C_x)=0\Rightarrow C_x=-13kN

The neg sign shows that C_x is indeed leftwards. Now to find B_x I used Sum of Forces.
this time I used the REVISED sense of C_x and the ASSUMED sense of B_x:

This gives me B_x-13kN=0\Rightarrow B_x=13kN which seems to be a conflict. Why would B_x be positive. Clearly it should have the same sign as C_x.

Where have I gone completely awry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The x-reactions at B and C are in opposite directions. B is under tension, while C is in compression. The two load P1 and P2 pivot about B, pushing on C.

In contrast, load P1 and P2 pivot about C pulling on B.

One has to calculate the moments about B and C, due to P1, P2 and the other reaction.

There is a vertical reaction at B, which is just the sum of P1 and P2, since the roller at C provides no reaction.
 
Astronuc said:
The x-reactions at B and C are in opposite directions. B is under tension, while C is in compression. The two load P1 and P2 pivot about B, pushing on C.

In contrast, load P1 and P2 pivot about C pulling on B.

One has to calculate the moments about B and C, due to P1, P2 and the other reaction.

There is a vertical reaction at B, which is just the sum of P1 and P2, since the roller at C provides no reaction.

Yeah Nuc! Thanks! I have always trusted the math over my intuition and it is a problem such as this that confirms my trust in math over myself! It seems like I have to make every mistake that exists at least once before I can predict future ones of the like.

Hopefully that will change, otherwise I will make a lethal engineer!:rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
35K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K