Why do Balloons filled with Air not fall at 9.6m/s/s?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Salbris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Fall
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Balloons filled with air do not fall at the expected acceleration of 9.6 m/s² due to the principles of buoyancy and terminal velocity. When a balloon is inflated with exhaled breath, it contains a gas mixture that is nearly identical in density to the surrounding air, primarily composed of nitrogen and a small percentage of carbon dioxide. The terminal velocity of the balloon is significantly lower than the gravitational acceleration, resulting in a slow descent rather than a rapid fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy principles
  • Knowledge of gas densities, specifically air and carbon dioxide
  • Familiarity with terminal velocity concepts
  • Basic physics principles related to gravity and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of buoyancy in fluids
  • Explore the relationship between gas density and buoyancy
  • Learn about terminal velocity and its factors
  • Investigate the composition of exhaled breath and its effects on buoyancy
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching concepts of buoyancy and motion, and anyone interested in the behavior of gases in different environments.

Salbris
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've been racking my brain to figure this one out, I really don't understand it.

If you fill a balloon with air from your lungs, just manually blow it up, it should be carbon dioxide, no?

Density of Carbon Dioxide at Sea Level: 1.977 g/L
Density of Air at Sea Level: 1.2 g/L

So it's heavier. I know I'm pulling these numbers out of seemingly nowhere, but I'm sure someone can verify they are accurate.


So why on Earth would a balloon filled with a gas heavier than the surrounding gas in it's environment not drop at the normal speed. Aren't I right to think that bouyancy only takes effect when the gas inside the balloon is at least a bit lighter?

Or is there some critical property I'm missing?

Please enlighten me, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you recall that Gallileo dropped a feather off the Tower of Pisa, as well as a 1 pound weight and a ten pound weight:
http://www.jimloy.com/physics/galileo.htm
Astronauts tried Gallileo's experiment on the moon. See:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you fill a balloon up with your breath it would be mostly nitrogen just like the air you breathed in.

Also, with a density so close to that of the air it is prone to the slightest disturbances from the air.
 
Salbris said:
I've been racking my brain to figure this one out, I really don't understand it.

If you fill a balloon with air from your lungs, just manually blow it up, it should be carbon dioxide, no?

Density of Carbon Dioxide at Sea Level: 1.977 g/L
Density of Air at Sea Level: 1.2 g/L

So it's heavier. I know I'm pulling these numbers out of seemingly nowhere, but I'm sure someone can verify they are accurate.


So why on Earth would a balloon filled with a gas heavier than the surrounding gas in it's environment not drop at the normal speed. Aren't I right to think that bouyancy only takes effect when the gas inside the balloon is at least a bit lighter?

Or is there some critical property I'm missing?

Please enlighten me, thank you.
1] As pointed out, your exhaled breath is almost exactly the same as the air. It has an extra 5% CO2 and is shy by the same amount of oxygen.

2] You've got a volume of air, that weighs maybe a gram or two more than the surrounding air, but it has a giant surface area. It's terminal velocity is on the order of a few feet per second.
 
DaveC426913 said:
1] As pointed out, your exhaled breath is almost exactly the same as the air. It has an extra 5% CO2 and is shy by the same amount of oxygen.

2] You've got a volume of air, that weighs maybe a gram or two more than the surrounding air, but it has a giant surface area. It's terminal velocity is on the order of a few feet per second.

Ahh, Terminal Velocity. Now that makes sense. :)

Thanks for pointing that out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K