Why Do Different Colors Appear When Using a Polarimeter on Sucrose Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasfox1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical
AI Thread Summary
When using a polarimeter on a sucrose solution, varying colors appear due to the phenomenon of optical activity, where chiral molecules rotate the plane of polarized light. The rotation angle differs for different wavelengths of light, causing colors like red and blue to emerge at various angles as the analyzer polarizer is adjusted. This occurs because the refractive index of the solution varies with wavelength, leading to different rotation amounts for each color. During measurements, it's common to focus on the minimum light reading rather than the colors observed. Using a monochromatic light source can minimize color variation, but slight differences in refractive indices may still cause minor shifts in the observed light.
thomasfox1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a 17 year old college student from the UK carrying out an experiment to build a polarimeter to determine the specific rotation of sugars. However, I have a problem when I shine polarised light through my sucrose solution and turn the analyser polariser filter I see colours ranging from clear to yellow to blue and back again - rather than no light which I would expect when two polarisers are crossed. I have been researching for weeks to discover the root of this problem but I cannot find any mention of different colours! If possible, could you explain the theory as to why this works? I understand that chiral molecules rotate the plane of polarised light but I do not understand why I see different colours? As I haven't taken a physics A-level I find this very complicated. So far I have come across a number of things that may be to do with it (relevant or not). These are: ‘circular birefringence’, ‘circular dichroism’, ‘optical rotatory dispersion’, ‘left/right circularly polarised light’, ‘anisotropy’ and ‘isotropy’. I would appreciate a full explanation that isn't very complicated like some of the resources I find!. Thank you very much!

Tom
 
Science news on Phys.org
You know about refraction, where a ray of light bends when it enters a material with a different refractive index.

Some "optically active" crystals have a refractive index that depends on the angle between the polarisation direction of incident light and the symmetry axes of the crystal. What that turns out to mean in practice is that a polarised light beam striking such a crystal may come out with a different polarisation direction.

How does that affect your polarimeter? The first polar produces light polarised in the x-direction, for the sake of argument. The light passes through the crystal and rotates the polarisation direction (say) 15° clockwise. You can rotate the second polar to find the angle at which the light completely disappears - 15° clockwise of the y axis, in this case. As you rotate the polar, the amount of light you see varies from nothing to full brightness and back down to nothing every 180°.

So where do the colours come in? Basically, refractive index depends on wavelength - very strongly in some materials, less so in others. This means that the angle that the crystal rotates the light depends on the wavelength. So red light might rotate 15° and blue light 20°. Then, as you rotate the second polar, the amount of red light and the amount of blue light vary at different angles. So at some angles you see red light; at some angles, blue; at others, some red and some blue (purple).

Does that help to answer you?
 
Thank you giving a detailed explanation and a very quickly too. I just have a few more questions if that's okay. When taking a polarimeter measurement do you ignore the colours and take a minimum light reading anyway? for some reason not all the light is lost when I have rotated the second polar. Also when you said differwent wavelengths of light get rotated by different amounts; if you use a monochromatic light source of a very narrow wavelength such a sodium lamp/LED light will the wavelength not be refracted by different amounts therefore not showing different colours? Is there any way of calculating the colours that are shown using refrative indices? Sorry if these questions appear stupid...

Thanks,
Tom
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top