Why do electromagnetic waves use complex numbers?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electromagnetic waves are represented by complex numbers due to the convenience of using Euler's theorem, which allows sinusoidal functions to be expressed as the real part of an imaginary exponential. This representation simplifies calculations, such as taking time derivatives to obtain velocities. The discussion highlights that using the phasor form, where \(\tilde E = E_0 e^{-j\vec k \cdot \vec R}\), streamlines the analysis of harmonic oscillators and electromagnetic waves. The application of complex numbers is particularly prevalent in RF and microwave electronics, where it aids in avoiding complex differential equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's theorem and complex exponentials
  • Familiarity with sinusoidal functions and harmonic oscillators
  • Knowledge of phasor representation in electromagnetic theory
  • Basic principles of RF and microwave electronics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Euler's theorem in wave mechanics
  • Learn about phasor analysis in RF circuit design
  • Explore the derivation of the wave equation in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the role of complex numbers in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and telecommunications, particularly those focused on electromagnetic theory and RF circuit design.

phabos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
why electromagnetic waves are represented by complex numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My answer is a bit general but I think its pretty relevant:

Waves and harmonic oscillators are represented by sinusoidal functions. Using Euler's theorem you can rewrite them as the (real part) of an imaginary exponential, where the exponent is i*(arg), where the argument is the same one you would use for an oscillator(wt +phase) or a wave (kx - or +wt + phase).

Its a bit more convenient to work with imaginary exponentials since they're more compact, taking their time derivatives to get velocities for example.

Something worth trying to illustrate that example: show that the total energy (T+V) of a harmonic oscillator is proportional to the square of the amplitude. You can do this either way, but I think its more compact if you use y(t) = Re{Ae^(iwt)} instead of Acoswt as your starting point.
 
EM wave usually are of sinusoidal nature. It is easier to represent harmonic wave ( sinusoidal) in cosine wave:

[tex]\vec E =E_0 cos\;(\omega t -\vec k\cdot \vec R)\;=\; \Re e [E_0 e^{j\omega t}e^{-j\vec k \cdot \vec R}][/tex]And then use phasor form where [itex]\tilde E = E_0 e^{-j\vec k \cdot \vec R} \;\hbox { and }\;\vec E = \Re e [\tilde E \;e^{j\omega t}][/itex]The solution of homogeneous harmonic wave equation is something like:

[tex]\nabla ^2 E +\delta^2 \vec E = 0 \;\hbox { is } E^+ e^{-\delta \vec k \cdot \vec R} +E^- e^{\delta \vec k \cdot \vec R} \;\hbox { where } \delta = \alpha + j\beta[/tex]It is not as common in Physics than in RF and microwave Electronics. In RF, we deal with transmission lines where we can assume the direction of propagation in z direction which really simplify the calculation tremendously. We avoid all the differential equations, PDE, integration and differentiation. In fact I learn in reverse order. I have been using phasor calculation to design filters, matching networks for years before I really start learning EM!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K