Why do emergency detectors use high pitched sounds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter newjerseyrunner
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
20 replies · 3K views
newjerseyrunner
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
637
I know that as humans age their abilities to hear high pitched deteriorates, even if the rest of their hearing doesn’t. So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound? I got to my in laws and their detector needed new batteries. Neither are hard of hearing but neither had any idea their detector was going off. Made me wonder if they’d even be able to hear it if it went off for real?
noises
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Smoke detectors aren't that high of a frequency. I believe they commonly use a frequency around 3 kHz.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You're misreading something. 1.76 kHz is two A's above middle C.
I'm just saying ... the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale. Maybe everything over a couple of KHz sounds high pitched but is still audible.
 
phinds said:
I'm just saying ... the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale. Maybe everything over a couple of KHz sounds high pitched but is still audible.
In terms of octaves, the human range is 11 octaves with 2 kHz falling in the 7th octave.

Also, the (normal) human ear is most sensitive to the 2-5 kHz range, so it would make sense to place an alert tone in this range.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009
newjerseyrunner said:
So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
Interesting question, which makes me think of many alarms clocks which also have (relatively) high pitched sounds. I wonder if it is beacuse it sounds more intense/is more annoying, so the listener is more inclined to take action or even wake up?

EDIT:
Janus said:
Also, the (normal) human ear is most sensitive to the 2-5 kHz range, so it would make sense to place an alert tone in this range.
Sounds like a good reason.
 
LOL, nope, nope, nope.:smile:
newjerseyrunner said:
I know that as humans age their abilities to hear high pitched deteriorates, even if the rest of their hearing doesn’t. So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
There is a practical reason for this, but it has little to do directly with the best range for human hearing...
Small, inexpensive piezo-based sound makers for low-cost consumer electronics happen to have that frequency range. You are not going to spend several dollars for a speaker-based sound maker in a product design, when you can use a simple sub-dollar piezo beeper instead... :smile:
 
phinds said:
the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale.

Ah, here's the thing you are missing. Hearing is logarithmic. Each octave is a factor of two in frequency.

berkeman said:
There is a practical reason for this, but it has little to do directly with the best range for human hearing...

I suspect the reason the devices are inexpensive is because they are mass produced in the range that is best for human hearing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NTL2009 and phinds
Simple and solid state construction probably helps as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Vanadium 50 said:
I suspect the reason the devices are inexpensive is because they are massed produced in the range that is best for human hearing.
Just a commercial goodness coinkidink. :smile:
 
newjerseyrunner said:
So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
In theory, because it is out of the range of the most commonly used frequencies. Usually apart from some bird songs there are not many sources for that range.

In reality, it is what @berkeman wrote under that spoiler button...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner and berkeman
if i remember right the resonant frequency of the human ear canal is around 3khz, so I am guessing that has something to do with it as well..

i know when mastering a music track, its common to dip down the volume in that range.
 
Rive said:
In theory, because it is out of the range of the most commonly used frequencies. Usually apart from some bird songs there are not many sources for that range.
Well, since birds already got mentioned - http://users.aber.ac.uk/rmm/urbansong.htm