Why do emergency detectors use high pitched sounds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter newjerseyrunner
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of high-pitched sounds used in emergency devices like carbon monoxide detectors. Participants note that while human hearing deteriorates with age, particularly at higher frequencies, emergency alarms often operate around 3 kHz, which falls within the peak sensitivity range of human hearing (2-5 kHz). This frequency choice is practical, as it is loud enough to be heard and can be produced using inexpensive, mass-produced components. Additionally, high-pitched sounds are perceived as more intense and annoying, prompting quicker responses. There is acknowledgment of the challenges some individuals face in hearing these alarms, leading to the development of specialized devices for the hearing impaired, which may include visual alerts like flashing strobes. The conversation highlights the balance between sound frequency, human hearing capabilities, and the practicalities of alarm design.
newjerseyrunner
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
637
I know that as humans age their abilities to hear high pitched deteriorates, even if the rest of their hearing doesn’t. So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound? I got to my in laws and their detector needed new batteries. Neither are hard of hearing but neither had any idea their detector was going off. Made me wonder if they’d even be able to hear it if it went off for real?
noises
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe because shrill sounds carry farther than lower frequencies?
 
phinds said:
carry farther than lower frequencies?
Do they? Google "elephant communication."
 
Bystander said:
Do they? Google "elephant communication."
Yeah, I googled around a bit. Turns out I apparently had it backwards.
 
Shrill is maybe 1 or 2 kHz? That's well within the peak of human hearing.
 
Smoke detectors aren't that high of a frequency. I believe they commonly use a frequency around 3 kHz.
 
phinds said:
?

That's very low on in the range of human hearing:

You're misreading something. 1.76 kHz is two A's above middle C.
 
  • Like
Likes NTL2009 and berkeman
Vanadium 50 said:
You're misreading something. 1.76 kHz is two A's above middle C.
I'm just saying ... the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale. Maybe everything over a couple of KHz sounds high pitched but is still audible.
 
  • #10
phinds said:
I'm just saying ... the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale. Maybe everything over a couple of KHz sounds high pitched but is still audible.
In terms of octaves, the human range is 11 octaves with 2 kHz falling in the 7th octave.

Also, the (normal) human ear is most sensitive to the 2-5 kHz range, so it would make sense to place an alert tone in this range.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes NTL2009
  • #11
newjerseyrunner said:
So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
Interesting question, which makes me think of many alarms clocks which also have (relatively) high pitched sounds. I wonder if it is beacuse it sounds more intense/is more annoying, so the listener is more inclined to take action or even wake up?

EDIT:
Janus said:
Also, the (normal) human ear is most sensitive to the 2-5 kHz range, so it would make sense to place an alert tone in this range.
Sounds like a good reason.
 
  • #12
LOL, nope, nope, nope.:smile:
newjerseyrunner said:
I know that as humans age their abilities to hear high pitched deteriorates, even if the rest of their hearing doesn’t. So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
There is a practical reason for this, but it has little to do directly with the best range for human hearing...
Small, inexpensive piezo-based sound makers for low-cost consumer electronics happen to have that frequency range. You are not going to spend several dollars for a speaker-based sound maker in a product design, when you can use a simple sub-dollar piezo beeper instead... :smile:
 
  • #13
phinds said:
the human range of hearing goes up to 20KHz, so a couple of KHz is low on that scale.

Ah, here's the thing you are missing. Hearing is logarithmic. Each octave is a factor of two in frequency.

berkeman said:
There is a practical reason for this, but it has little to do directly with the best range for human hearing...

I suspect the reason the devices are inexpensive is because they are mass produced in the range that is best for human hearing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes NTL2009 and phinds
  • #14
Simple and solid state construction probably helps as well.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
I suspect the reason the devices are inexpensive is because they are massed produced in the range that is best for human hearing.
Just a commercial goodness coinkidink. :smile:
 
  • #18
newjerseyrunner said:
So why do emergency things like CO detectors use such a high pitched sound?
In theory, because it is out of the range of the most commonly used frequencies. Usually apart from some bird songs there are not many sources for that range.

In reality, it is what @berkeman wrote under that spoiler button...
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner and berkeman
  • #19
Lower frequency alarms need bigger speakers to achieve same volume.
 
  • Like
Likes newjerseyrunner
  • #20
if i remember right the resonant frequency of the human ear canal is around 3khz, so I am guessing that has something to do with it as well..

i know when mastering a music track, its common to dip down the volume in that range.
 
  • #21
Rive said:
In theory, because it is out of the range of the most commonly used frequencies. Usually apart from some bird songs there are not many sources for that range.
Well, since birds already got mentioned - http://users.aber.ac.uk/rmm/urbansong.htm
 
Back
Top