- #1

- 5

- 0

## Main Question or Discussion Point

When looking at the FFT spectrum of a sonometer, I noticed that the harmonics decayed faster than the fundamental. Why is this?

- I
- Thread starter Joella Kait
- Start date

- #1

- 5

- 0

When looking at the FFT spectrum of a sonometer, I noticed that the harmonics decayed faster than the fundamental. Why is this?

- #2

anorlunda

Mentor

- 8,244

- 5,060

Do you mean they decay fasterWhen looking at the FFT spectrum of a sonometer, I noticed that the harmonics decayed faster than the fundamental. Why is this?

- #3

- 5

- 0

Yes, I mean decaying faster in time. We kept the FFT spectrum running while we plucked the string and watched peaks form then decay, and the harmonics decayed faster. If this is still confusing (probably due to my inability to explain it well), then don't worry about the FFT part. The point of my question is that I want to know why the harmonics decay faster than the fundamental mode in vibrating string.

Do you mean they decay fasterin time?Looking at a FFT will not show you that, so your question confuses me.

- #4

- 3,071

- 741

Sure it would, if you had the FFT at various points in time. This is sometimes called a short-time Fourier transform (STFT).Do you mean they decay fasterin time?Looking at a FFT will not show you that, so your question confuses me.

Out of curiosity here, did you actually measure the decay rates of the fundamental and harmonic and the decay rates were actually different, or did you just notice that the harmonic disappears first?Yes, I mean decaying faster in time. We kept the FFT spectrum running while we plucked the string and watched peaks form then decay, and the harmonics decayed faster. If this is still confusing (probably due to my inability to explain it well), then don't worry about the FFT part. The point of my question is that I want to know why the harmonics decay faster than the fundamental mode in vibrating string.

- #5

- 5

- 0

I just eyeballed it, and noticed that the harmonics seem to decay faster. I then googled it, and read that this is usually the case, but I'm not sure why.Sure it would, if you had the FFT at various points in time. This is sometimes called a short-time Fourier transform (STFT).

Out of curiosity here, did you actually measure the decay rates of the fundamental and harmonic and the decay rates were actually different, or did you just notice that the harmonic disappears first?

- #6

berkeman

Mentor

- 56,836

- 6,800

Do you understand where the harmonics come from on a guitar string?I just eyeballed it, and noticed that the harmonics seem to decay faster. I then googled it, and read that this is usually the case, but I'm not sure why.

And could you post a link to where you read that it us usually the case? There are plenty of systems where this is not the case...

- #7

anorlunda

Mentor

- 8,244

- 5,060

A general answer is that most physical systems are low pass filters. They attenuate high frequencies more than low frequencies. There are exceptions, but most things are like that.

- #8

- 3,132

- 2,146

I think I'd need to see the data to be convinced otherwise.

- #9

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 24,282

- 4,307

The energy in a simple free oscillator will decay exponentially and the Q factor is the number of cycles for the energy to drop to 1/e of an initial value.and read that this is usually the case, but I'm not sure why.

If the various modes on the string all have the same Q factor (a bit of an assumption perhaps but go with it) then the energy in the modes will all take the same number of cycles of oscillationto fall to 1/e of the original value. That would take half as long for a second harmonic and one third as long for a third harmonic.

- #10

- 3,132

- 2,146

It is an errant assumption that the different modes all start with a peak energy and decay independently. In reality, energy is traded back and forth between modes and amplitudes of a given spectral peak will both rise and fall over time. Sure, in the long term, they are all decreasing, but the decrease of some modes is not even monotonic, much less exponential.The energy in a simple free oscillator will decay exponentially and the Q factor is the number of cycles for the energy to drop to 1/e of an initial value.

If the various modes on the string all have the same Q factor (a bit of an assumption perhaps but go with it) then the energy in the modes will all take the same number of cycles of oscillationto fall to 1/e of the original value. That would take half as long for a second harmonic and one third as long for a third harmonic.

- #11

marcusl

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,714

- 377

- #12

davenn

Science Advisor

Gold Member

2019 Award

- 9,125

- 7,067

agreed. and "

A general answer is that most physical systems are low pass filters. They attenuate high frequencies more than low frequencies. There are exceptions, but most things are like that.

this, along with the low pass filter function, means the harmonics "usually" die out sooner

Dave

- #13

rcgldr

Homework Helper

- 8,680

- 514

https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys406/sp2017/Student_Projects/Fall02/RLee/Ryan_Lee_P398EMI_Main_Report.pdf

Note it's also possible to place a finger on the node of a harmonic to prevent the fundamental frequency from being generated (or at least greatly reduce it).

- #14

- 3,132

- 2,146

How is a theoretical question. One need not answer the how to look at the data and understand that it definitely does happen.

https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys406/sp2017/Student_Projects/Fall02/RLee/Ryan_Lee_P398EMI_Main_Report.pdf

For example, look at the amplitude of the harmonics in yellow and green in Figure 1 of the above report. The amplitude is definitely rising and falling rather than decreasing monotonically in time. Likewise, look at the 3rd, 5th, and 6th harmonics in Figure 2 of the above report (also yellow and green): once again amplitudes rise and fall.

Modes are orthogonal in the theory. But real strings do not completely obey the theory.

- #15

- 3,132

- 2,146

Actually, Figure 4 also shows a case where the 2nd harmonic decays more slowly than the fundamental. Given that two of four cases shown in that paper have the fundamental decaying more slowly than the 2nd harmonic, I'm not sure you have a strong case for a trend.

https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys406/sp2017/Student_Projects/Fall02/RLee/Ryan_Lee_P398EMI_Main_Report.pdf

Note it's also possible to place a finger on the node of a harmonic to prevent the fundamental frequency from being generated (or at least greatly reduce it).

- #16

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 24,282

- 4,307

I made a broad assumption - true. But the modes would be orthogonal on an ideal string. A guitar has a complex set of resonances and the ends of the strings are not well defined or constant throughout the ranger of angles made by the string. This can result in frequency / mode length modulation of one mode by another mode. In fact, the fact that your effect is observed actually implies that there must be some non linearity. Also, of course, the overtones are not perfect harmonics of the fundamental and you could perhaps expect some beating between modal frequencies and harmonics of the fundamental due to non linearity. Quite a can of worms, in fact.It is an errant assumption that the different modes all start with a peak energy and decay independently. In reality, energy is traded back and forth between modes and amplitudes of a given spectral peak will both rise and fall over time. Sure, in the long term, they are all decreasing, but the decrease of some modes is not even monotonic, much less exponential.

I looked at the graphs in your l ink and I notice that the 'trading' of energy between modes tends to die out as the amplitudes reduce after the initial attack and I would suggest that the system behaves more linearly at low amplitudes. The near 2:1 ratio of the decay times of 2nd and 4th order modes sort of justify my comment about decay being about numbers of cycles when the Q factors are similar.

PS That's an interesting paper. An idea topic for a computer [Edit - I meant Guitar enthusiast] enthusiast / nerd. A busman's holiday as the English say.

Last edited:

- #17

- 3,071

- 741

This most commonly takes the form of quadratic phase coupling, i.e. there are quadratic terms in the dependent variable in the governing equations. That allows energy exchange between otherwise normal modes.

While a guitar strings is likely pretty close to ideal for small amplitudes, it would be fairly unusual for a real-world problem with all the aforementioned complications to not include some degree of nonlinearity at higher amplitudes.

- #18

Mister T

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,523

- 796

What did you see that led you to this conclusion? When I pluck a string and look at the FFT what I usually notice is that the higher harmonics have a smaller amplitude. This is not always the case, as it depends to some extent on how the string is plucked. In any case, the information I get about the relative amplitude of the harmonics doesn't necessarily tell me which of them are decaying faster.I just eyeballed it, and noticed that the harmonics seem to decay faster.

- #19

- 3,071

- 741

This is why I asked my original question about how OP was reaching this conclusion, and whether he or she actually measured the decay rate or simply based it on which peak disappeared first.What did you see that led you to this conclusion? When I pluck a string and look at the FFT what I usually notice is that the higher harmonics have a smaller amplitude. This is not always the case, as it depends to some extent on how the string is plucked. In any case, the information I get about the relative amplitude of the harmonics doesn't necessarily tell me which of them are decaying faster.

- #20

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 24,282

- 4,307

If we're going into details it might be interesting to ask how the sonometer string was excited - for instance was it plucked and where. Also, how was the string tensioned and were there any other strings on the apparatus at the same time?This is why I asked my original question about how OP was reaching this conclusion, and whether he or she actually measured the decay rate or simply based it on which peak disappeared first.

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 7K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 40

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 528

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 913